Robertson: Apology with a Clause

Pat Robertson apologized for his remarks Monday about Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan President. However, he couldn’t quite find it in his heart to make a fulfledged apology… oh no, his apology has a clause:

“Is it right to call for assassination?” Robertson said. “No, and I apologize for that statement. I spoke in frustration that we should accommodate the man who thinks the U.S. is out to kill him.”

“I said before the war in Iraq began that the wisest course would be to wage war against Saddam Hussein, not the whole nation of Iraq,” Robertson says in the statement. “When faced with the threat of a comparable dictator in our own hemisphere, would it not be wiser to wage war against one person rather than finding ourselves down the road locked in another bitter struggle with a whole nation?”

The apology comes in the wake of Robertson denying that he said that Chavez should be assassinated.

On Wednesday, he initially denied having called for Chavez to be killed and said The Associated Press had misinterpreted his remarks.

“I didn’t say ‘assassination.’ I said our special forces should ’take him out,”’ Robertson said on his show. “’Take him out’ could be a number of things including kidnapping.”

I distinctly remember being taught in Sunday School, not to lie.

Bookmark and Share

About Pamela Leavey

Pamela Leavey is the Editor in Chief, Owner/Publisher of The Democratic Daily as well as a freelance writer and photographer. Pamela holds a certificate in Contemporary Communications from UMass Lowell, a Journalism Certificate from UMass Amherst and a B.A. in Creative Writing and Digital Age Communications from UMass Amherst UWW.
Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Robertson: Apology with a Clause

  1. Duncan says:

    Your posting is both concise and witty. I was looking for something like that to include it in my new weblog (in both Spanish and English) since I have a special disgust for the Right Wing Fundamentalist so-called christians. I do not think Jesus would consider them followers.

  2. Hi Duncan

    Good to see a bilingual blog out there. I agree, I don’t think Jesus would consider them followers either.