There have been suggestions and comparisons made regarding the Vietnam War and the Iraq War. The Bush administration always discounts those comparisons. However, AP writer Douglass K. Daniel, has put together a comparison of Bush on Iraq and LBJ on Vietnam in 1967, that shows striking similarites.
“America is committed to the defense of South Vietnam until an honorable peace can be negotiated,” Johnson told the Tennessee Legislature on March 15, 1967. Despite the obstacles to victory, the president said, “We shall stay the course.”
After 14 Marines died in a roadside bombing on Aug. 3, Bush declared: “We will stay the course, we will complete the job in Iraq. And the job is this: We’ll help the Iraqis develop a democracy.”
Daniel says, “The two wars were waged quite differently even though they shared similar aims.” Rumsfeld said recently, “The differences are so notable that it would take too long to list them.”
About 500,000 U.S. troops were in Vietnam in 1967 after a three-year buildup, compared with about 140,000 in Iraq today. Heavy aerial bombing was a primary U.S. strategy in Vietnam while Iraq, after the initial campaign of “shock and awe,” has been mainly a ground war. The U.S. negotiated for peace in Vietnam, but there is no single entity with which to negotiate in Iraq.
Both John and Bush used similar arguments to “stay the course”: “War was justified to protect the U.S. and to encourage freedom everywhere.” Also, “faced with mounting losses on the battlefield, both presidents offered the dead as a reason to keep fighting.”
“When a war is long-lived and the outcome is not demonstrably positive, the lines of argument available to a president are seriously constrained,” said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. “Democrat or Republican, 1960s or early part of the 21st century, you’re going to hear a common rhetoric.”
South Vietnam, politically unstable because of internal violence and corruption, stumbled toward elections to adopt a constitution and to select officials — not unlike the process Iraq is undergoing.
“Our nation was not born easily. There were times in those years of the 18th century when it seemed as if we might not be born at all,” Johnson said in a speech on Aug. 16, 1967.
“Given that background, we ought not to be astonished that this struggle in Vietnam continues,” Johnson said. “We ought not to be astonished that that nation, wracked by a war of insurgency and beset by its neighbors to the north, has not already emerged, full-blown, as a perfect model of two-party democracy.”
Like LBJ, Bush, “has compared Iraq’s difficulties in determining its political future to postcolonial America’s.”
In his radio address on Aug. 27, Bush said: “Like our own nation’s founders over two centuries ago, the Iraqis are grappling with difficult issues, such as the role of the federal government. What is important is that Iraqis are now addressing these issues through debate and discussion — not at the barrel of a gun.”
Bush has often linked the security and freedom of the United States to the war in Iraq. On Aug. 4 he told reporters: “We’re laying the foundation of peace for generations to come. We’re defeating the terrorists in a place like Iraq so we don’t have to face them here at home. And, as well, we’re spreading democracy and freedom to parts of the world that are desperate for democracy and freedom.”
A secure and free America was tied to the fight in Southeast Asia, Johnson maintained. “What happens in Vietnam is extremely important to the nation’s freedom and it is extremely important to the United States’ security,” he said from the South Lawn of the White House on Sept. 15, 1967.
“The question of progress amid a rising death toll” plagued both Johnson and Bush.
“Be assured that the death of your son will have meaning,” Johnson told the parents of a posthumous recipient of the Medal of Honor during a Rose Garden ceremony on April 6, 1967. “For I give you also my solemn pledge that our country will persist — and will prevail — in the cause for which your boy died.”
Speaking to military families in Idaho on Aug. 24, Bush said: “These brave men and women gave their lives for a cause that is just and necessary for the security of our country, and now we will honor their sacrifice by completing their mission.”
Bush remains blindly “optimistic about the outcome of the war though just four out of 10 of those polled favor his handling of it.”
What Bush’s reaction to an estimated 250,000 anti-war protestors converging on Washington, D.C. on Saturday, remains to be seen.