













































































































<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Terrorists Aren&#8217;t Soldiers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/08/14/why-terrorists-arent-soldiers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/08/14/why-terrorists-arent-soldiers/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/08/14/why-terrorists-arent-soldiers/comment-page-1/#comment-35113</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6392#comment-35113</guid>
		<description>It must have been fun for Bushie Boy, this far into it, to have his strongest foreign partner say &quot;We&#039;re just not going to have a War On Terror anymore.&quot; What it must have been like to be a fly on that wall! And then to be told in no uncertain terms (because it must have happened) that this is just not negotiable. Dude hasn&#039;t had near enough of that over the years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must have been fun for Bushie Boy, this far into it, to have his strongest foreign partner say &#8220;We&#8217;re just not going to have a War On Terror anymore.&#8221; What it must have been like to be a fly on that wall! And then to be told in no uncertain terms (because it must have happened) that this is just not negotiable. Dude hasn&#8217;t had near enough of that over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart ONeill</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/08/14/why-terrorists-arent-soldiers/comment-page-1/#comment-35112</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart ONeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6392#comment-35112</guid>
		<description>Wes Clark should be in this race! He&#039;s qualified on many levels not just foreign policy.

It&#039;s a sad statement that he believes the reality of the race will keep him from competing. That translates to speeding the last two years building a future organization and getting funding sources.

Wes Clark spent the last two years working to get &lt;em&gt;Democratic Congresspeople elected&lt;/em&gt;. He thought that was the honest thing to do.

Money keeps him out of this race. It is sad beyond comprehension. He would elevate the discourse.

Read what he said to Charlie Rose:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Charlie Rose: You have not ruled out a candidacy this year.

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: No, I haven&#039;t. No, I haven&#039;t. I think about it every day. I&#039;d love to be able to run.

Charlie Rose: Why can&#039;t you?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: It&#039;s- There are several preconditions that have to be met, and they haven&#039;t been met. And, and I&#039;ve worked with them, and I&#039;ve tried to work around them, and I haven&#039;t been able to. It was a great, it was a tremendous honor and a great experience to run the first time. If you run the second time, you, you want to really have a shot at winning, and that means you&#039;ve got to have the money and the organization behind you. And I&#039;ve worked to, on this from several different angles and until and unless I believe that there&#039;s a genuine candidacy out there, I can&#039;t do this. I, it, it&#039;s not enough to just go out there and say, &#039;I&#039;m running, because I believe in it.&#039; There&#039;s a lot of people who want me to run, but I haven&#039;t met the preconditions I&#039;ve set for myself.
&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://securingamerica.com/node/2579&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Check   &lt;/a&gt;his lastest statements, including this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes Clark should be in this race! He&#8217;s qualified on many levels not just foreign policy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad statement that he believes the reality of the race will keep him from competing. That translates to speeding the last two years building a future organization and getting funding sources.</p>
<p>Wes Clark spent the last two years working to get <em>Democratic Congresspeople elected</em>. He thought that was the honest thing to do.</p>
<p>Money keeps him out of this race. It is sad beyond comprehension. He would elevate the discourse.</p>
<p>Read what he said to Charlie Rose:</p>
<blockquote><p>Charlie Rose: You have not ruled out a candidacy this year.</p>
<p>GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: No, I haven&#8217;t. No, I haven&#8217;t. I think about it every day. I&#8217;d love to be able to run.</p>
<p>Charlie Rose: Why can&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: It&#8217;s- There are several preconditions that have to be met, and they haven&#8217;t been met. And, and I&#8217;ve worked with them, and I&#8217;ve tried to work around them, and I haven&#8217;t been able to. It was a great, it was a tremendous honor and a great experience to run the first time. If you run the second time, you, you want to really have a shot at winning, and that means you&#8217;ve got to have the money and the organization behind you. And I&#8217;ve worked to, on this from several different angles and until and unless I believe that there&#8217;s a genuine candidacy out there, I can&#8217;t do this. I, it, it&#8217;s not enough to just go out there and say, &#8216;I&#8217;m running, because I believe in it.&#8217; There&#8217;s a lot of people who want me to run, but I haven&#8217;t met the preconditions I&#8217;ve set for myself.
</p></blockquote>
<p> <a href="http://securingamerica.com/node/2579" rel="nofollow">Check   </a>his lastest statements, including this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alrudder</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/08/14/why-terrorists-arent-soldiers/comment-page-1/#comment-35111</link>
		<dc:creator>alrudder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=6392#comment-35111</guid>
		<description>This is a tough matter to handle, but very important in the &#039;08 election.  Gordon Brown just banned the phrase &quot;war on terror&quot;, for all the reasons Todd mentioned.  The most intellectually honest phrase that can fit on a bumper sticker comes from Obama &quot;assault on terrorists&quot;.  Also &quot;Global Counterinsurgency&quot; is gaining popularity, but it has too many syllables.

The high-wire act for Democrats is to do these two things at once:
1. Stop dignifying terrorists as warriors.
2. Make it clear to the voters that you will not hesitate at a moment&#039;s notice to use the military to fight these people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a tough matter to handle, but very important in the &#8217;08 election.  Gordon Brown just banned the phrase &#8220;war on terror&#8221;, for all the reasons Todd mentioned.  The most intellectually honest phrase that can fit on a bumper sticker comes from Obama &#8220;assault on terrorists&#8221;.  Also &#8220;Global Counterinsurgency&#8221; is gaining popularity, but it has too many syllables.</p>
<p>The high-wire act for Democrats is to do these two things at once:<br />
1. Stop dignifying terrorists as warriors.<br />
2. Make it clear to the voters that you will not hesitate at a moment&#8217;s notice to use the military to fight these people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

