Time for Congress to ‘Move-On’!

Something really awful happened in the Senate today.

The 1st Amendment was symbolically sacrificed to the alter of the Military and the War Machine.

On December 15, 1791, the 1st Amendment to the Constitution was ratified. It stated:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Yet today, the Senate took the time to pass a symbolic resolution defending the honor and criticizing the MoveOn.org ad on General Petraeus and stated that Petraeus

“deserves the full support of the Senate” and the Senate “strongly condemn(s) personal attacks on the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all members of the United States Armed Forces.”

However, moments earlier Senators failed to condemn the same kind of political activity, failing to support the ‘Boxer Amendment’, which also included condemnation against attacks on politicians and Veterans like Max Cleland, the Vietnam Veteran who lost both legs and an arm in Vietnam who lost to Republican Saxby Chambliss who compared him to Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. Or Senator John Kerry, the multiple-decorated Vietnam Veteran whose reputation was slimed by the Swift Boaters.

But criticism of the so-called apolitical General Petraeus, who found time in the weeks before the 2004 election to write and submit a very political and misleading column about the success of the Iraq effort helped turn the tide for President Bush against Senator Kerry–that kind of criticism is simply unacceptable in America according to these America-love-it-or-leave-it Senators.

On September 26, 2004, just weeks before the Presidential Election, Petreus took the time to write about how well things were going in Iraq. He stated:

“Nonetheless, there are reasons for optimism. Today approximately 164,000 Iraqi police and soldiers (of which about 100,000 are trained and equipped) and an additional 74,000 facility protection forces are performing a wide variety of security missions. Equipment is being delivered. Training is on track and increasing in capacity. Infrastructure is being repaired. Command and control structures and institutions are being reestablished.”

And yet even Petraeus has a spotty record in Iraq.
As the Washington Post reported on August 6, 2007:

“The author of the report from the Government Accountability Office says U.S. military officials do not know what happened to 30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces from 2004 through early this year as part of an effort to train and equip the troops. The highest previous estimate of unaccounted-for weapons was 14,000, in a report issued last year by the inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

The United States has spent $19.2 billion trying to develop Iraqi security forces since 2003, the GAO said, including at least $2.8 billion to buy and deliver equipment. But the GAO said weapons distribution was haphazard and rushed and failed to follow established procedures, particularly from 2004 to 2005, when security training was led by Gen. David H. Petraeus, who now commands all U.S. forces in Iraq.”

Oh, but there I go again being critical of Petraeus when it is Move-On.Org that is our nation’s biggest problem.

Our fearless President understands that if we criticize Petraeus, then it is the criticism of him that is treason. As was reported:

” Bush told reporters at a White House news conference that MoveOn.org’s ad in The New York Times about Gen. David Petraeus was a “sorry deal.” The September 10 full-page ad was titled “General Petraeus or General Betray Us?”

“I felt like the ad was an attack, not only on Gen. Petraeus, but on the U.S. military,” Bush said. “And I was disappointed that not more leaders in the Democratic Party spoke out strongly against that kind of ad.”

The Vice-President, even though he is not really part of the Executive Branch, felt compelled to jump in on the pile-on. Cheney stated:

“The attacks on him by MoveOn.org in ad space provided at subsidized rates in The New York Times last week were an outrage.”

But that is pure Cheney. The outrage is that somehow they got a good rate to make the attack. Maybe if they had paid a higher rate at the Times, Cheney wouldn’t have had any comment. Or maybe he would have been busy hunting and shooting somebody in the face instead.

Even though Giuliani ran an ad in the same paper the same day at the same rate, better to talk about the liberal media. The same blog in the NYTimes points out:

“Rudolph W. Giuliani, a Republican presidential candidate who is among those who criticized the MoveOn ad, paid the same rate for his own advocacy ad that ran in the Friday editions of The Times.”

But maybe all of the Congress is betraying us. They haven’t stopped the war that was started on false pretenses. The mission isn’t accomplished. And as a report in the Guardian today (9/21/07) noted:

The latest identifications reported by the military:

– Army Sgt. Edmund J. Jeffers, 23, Daleville, Ala.; died Wednesday in Taqqadum of injuries from a non-combat related accident; assigned to the 1st Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division, Fort Carson, Colo.

– Army Pfc. Christian M. Neff, 19, Lima, Ohio; died Wednesday in Baghdad of wounds from an explosive; assigned to the 1st Battalion, 64th Armor Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, Ga.

– Army Spc. Aaron J. Walker, 23, Harker Heights, Texas; died Tuesday in Baghdad of wounds from small-arms fire; assigned to the 3rd Squadron, 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment, 1st Armored Division, Vilseck, Germany.

– Three Army soldiers died Tuesday in Muqdadiyah of wounds from an explosion. All were assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division (Stryker Brigade Combat Team), Fort Lewis, Wash.

Killed were Spc. Joseph N. Landry III, 23, Pensacola, Fla.; Spc. Nicholas P. Olson, 22, Novato, Calif.; and Spc. Donald E. Valentine III, 21, Orange Park, Fla.

None of these young men and women died because somebody protested a war.

But 3,791 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March, 2003.

And Congress, including some intimidated Democrats, is now busy passing resolutions condemning those who protest this needless war as being somehow not supporting our troops. For them, it is necessary to send soldiers into harm’s way without honest justification as the only true way to show your support.

And please be quiet if you disagree, or you shall be labeled a traitor. Forget about the 1st Amendment. Forget about our freedoms. We are at war now. And those need to be saved for some future reference.

Bookmark and Share

About Robert Freedland

A concerned American and supporter of Senator John Kerry, I am the author of the blog "John Kerry for President 2008". I am also the author of the stock market investing blog, "Stock Picks Bob's Advice".
Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Time for Congress to ‘Move-On’!

  1. Darrell Prows says:

    This is one sorry thing. I’m not sure anybody in the country really cares about that ad having been run except all of the nut jobs on the right, and half of the Democrats in the Senate.

    The only surging we’ve done in Iraq that has been effective has been the guns and money for bribes surge that has bought (for how long?) changed loyalties. Petraeus knows that better than anyone and actively tries to hide the truth. Petraeus knows that we will not support what is actually happening, and he’s getting his rocks off on being a big time General fighting a shooting war that he will actively help misrepresent the situation.

  2. John says:

    Yes, let’s ammend the Constitution so that no citizen can criticize a military commander. Furthermore, lets blindly believe everything the top military leaders tell us. Then we can start burning books that don’t quite fit the mode of how the military industrial complex wants to proceeed with its agenda. We can invade any country we want. After we take care of our foreign enemies lets begin attacking subversives at home. We can quickly eradicate all of the “undesirables” that have penetrated our borders and taken jobs away from Americans. Gee, I am glad we have such an enlightened president that he apparently agrees with all of the above. Does the story sound familiar? If not, go read the history of the National Socialist Democratic Party (otherwise known as the NAZIS).

  3. John H Watson says:

    I read these responses and I relize just how stupid and dumb those in the Democratic party are. Now of you have ever been to war, you would probably tuck your tails and run to Canada or to some other country where they except yellow belly cowards. All of you are nothing more than hot air wasting sapce in this country. Leave go become a Talaban or some other turban head they are who you are supporting.

  4. elmercreek says:

    Admiral William Fallon, Chief of Central Command, and Gen. Patraeus’ superior, allegedly called Patraeus “an ass – kissing little chickenshit”. Don’t see these Moveon.org vultures going after him.

  5. Oooh, TROLLS!

    John H. Watson: when one writes as poorly as you do, I’d be REAL careful about calling people “stupid and dumb.” As for being cowards, I’m sorry, YOU people are the pussies. You are the craven, yellow-bellied cowards who think that name calling is debate. Intellectual courage means that you debate decently, and that courage is what this nation was founded on. And it’s cowards like you who’ve brought it to this sad condition.

    elmercreek: what are you trying to defend? That Petraeus DIDN’T betray us with his bullshit report? That admirals can’t have an opinion? That you have a right to spew your moronic filth whenever you can sneak onto your mother’s computer?

    We moderate for trolls, and should you decide to reply, keep it polite, use your actual (alleged) brains, and pray that the moderator actually will tolerate your BS. (Hint: low BS tolerance today).

    Thank you for being today’s contestants on “HOW I ARE A TROLL.” You didn’t win anything, and we don’t have any parting gifts for you. Sorry.

  6. elmercreek says:

    elmercreek: what are you trying to defend? That Petraeus DIDN’T betray us with his bullshit report? That admirals can’t have an opinion?

    Quite the contrary HART. Guess I should have said the vultures preying on the Moveon.org ad. It was late, I was in a hurry and my mom wanted the computer!

    Admirals can have an opinion and do have an opinion but they aren’t being heard. We only get blasted by the rights propaganda, flag waving and patriotism. And inch by inch they’re taking away our rights.

    And John H Watson,
    Go and tell some soldier that he can’t critize some General after he’s seen his buddies die because this General refuses to extract a compromised patrol. Refuses to accept the situation on the ground. Are these soldiers “yellow belly cowards” too?

    Some Generals put career ahead of country. I don’t know enough about Patraeus to say he’s one of these but he has been a political General for a long time.

  7. To set the record straight… Let’s all watch who we call trolls around here. Elmercreek is a long time member of this community. Thank you.

  8. Elmercreek Is good people. I can vouch for that.

  9. All:

    Point taken. My apologies for my testiness here (and elsewhere). Perhaps if you could read the hate mail I receive by the gross ton … oh never mind. Points taken. Mea culpa.

  10. NotanotherClinton says:

    Your article said they passed a resolution, is that the same thing as a law against the Moveon.org ad slandering Gen Patraeus?

  11. Not,

    A resolution is not a law. They did not prohibit MoveOn from anything. But they expressed an official disapproval of a political advertisement.

    Shame on them.


  12. p.s.

    It isn’t slander if it is true. They raised a question, General Betray Us?. They didn’t say he was a turncoat.