













































































































<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Did What? Could Have Killed Osama but&#8230; Didn&#8217;t&#8230; Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Theobald</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Theobald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/#comment-463</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;d like to agree with the initial comment about bin Laden being more useful alive than dead, I think it&#039;s far more likely that Bush &amp; company are simply too incompetent to catch the guy.  I mean, let&#039;s face it.  They just aren&#039;t firing on all cylinders here.  Never have been.  

Call it what it is:  a bumbling daisychain.  Bleh.

  T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;d like to agree with the initial comment about bin Laden being more useful alive than dead, I think it&#8217;s far more likely that Bush &amp; company are simply too incompetent to catch the guy.  I mean, let&#8217;s face it.  They just aren&#8217;t firing on all cylinders here.  Never have been.  </p>
<p>Call it what it is:  a bumbling daisychain.  Bleh.</p>
<p>  T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around The Sphere Blogging Roundup October 27, 2007 &#187; The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Around The Sphere Blogging Roundup October 27, 2007 &#187; The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>[...] MISSED AGAIN: Bush &amp; Co. apparently missed another chance to kill terrorist bigwig Osama bin Laden (but, then, Bush has said he doesn&#8217;t spend much time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MISSED AGAIN: Bush &#38; Co. apparently missed another chance to kill terrorist bigwig Osama bin Laden (but, then, Bush has said he doesn&#8217;t spend much time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>No sources cited. No reason given for the decision not to go for it, nor any mention of who was actually in the loop.

With half of the story left out, it&#039;s tough to know what to believe. Is Bush a bonehead? Of course, and worse. Did he screw this up? Who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No sources cited. No reason given for the decision not to go for it, nor any mention of who was actually in the loop.</p>
<p>With half of the story left out, it&#8217;s tough to know what to believe. Is Bush a bonehead? Of course, and worse. Did he screw this up? Who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phranqlin</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Phranqlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Bush didn&#039;t wipe out Osama because he needs him alive and on the loose as a bogeyman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush didn&#8217;t wipe out Osama because he needs him alive and on the loose as a bogeyman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nut House &#187; &#8220;WILL NO ONE RID ME OF THIS MEDDLESOME TERRORIST?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nut House &#187; &#8220;WILL NO ONE RID ME OF THIS MEDDLESOME TERRORIST?&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/25/we-did-what-could-have-killed-osama-but-didnt-again/#comment-377</guid>
		<description>[...] Bu-bu-but that &#8220;source&#8221; is FOX NEWS! I thought we couldn&#8217;t believe anything we hear about the Administration from Fox. Surely there are plenty of lefties out there who will dismiss this story outright because of it&#8217;s source, right? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bu-bu-but that &#8220;source&#8221; is FOX NEWS! I thought we couldn&#8217;t believe anything we hear about the Administration from Fox. Surely there are plenty of lefties out there who will dismiss this story outright because of it&#8217;s source, right? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

