













































































































<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Jeff Gannon a &#8220;Fake White House Reporter&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margie Burns</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Margie Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-562</guid>
		<description>FIY: Here is an email that Mr. Guckert sent me after I had written about the WH Secret Service access logs, repeatedly accusing me of lying as you see. For the record, I stand by what I wrote. See below.

[Gannon-Guckert’s creepy email to me:]
“Margie:

You wrote:

&quot;On February 25, 2003, the White House began allowing entry by a right-wing
writer called Jeff Gannon, whose real name is James Guckert, as shown by
Secret Service White House access logs obtained through FOIA by
Representatives John Conyers and Louise Slaughter. Gannon’s access was
apparently designed to help the White House handle press briefings and press
conferences by salting the discussion with friendly questions.&quot; - This is an
outright lie, there is no evidence to support this claim.

&quot;Given the extensive manipulation going on in the White House as exposed by
the Libby trial, Guckert -- who declines to answer questions about his work
at the White House -- may also have helped coordinate information on which
journalists would be willing to boost the march to war.&quot; - This is also a
lie.  I have never declined to answer questions about my work at the White
House, in fact I have just finished writing a book that discusses the
subject in great detail.  Further, the conspiracy you allege concerning
other journalists is absurd.

&quot;On March 6, 2003, the president gave a rare White House press conference --
devoted almost entirely to scripted ‘questions’ inviting administration
remarks about Iraq, submitted for approval beforehand by reporters whom Bush
called upon in the press conference according to a prearranged list, as he
revealed at the time.&quot; - This is also a lie.  The President has a list of a
number of reporters from the major news organizations that he usually calls
on first.  The list is to make sure he doesn&#039;t leave anyone out that MUST be
called on (since doing so would spawn another conspiracy theory.)  There are
NEVER scripted questions from the White House.

Margie, I am gently correcting you in this way for two reasons.  First, the
claims you make are false and libelous and I will take action at some point to correct the record.  Second, when my book is published, you will appear
foolish if you persist in continuing to spread these falsehoods.

Be well,

Jeff Gannon”

[I did indeed email him asking about those WH access logs, and he did indeed refuse to answer questions about his WH access. Then I emailed him back, politely, and he did not answer.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FIY: Here is an email that Mr. Guckert sent me after I had written about the WH Secret Service access logs, repeatedly accusing me of lying as you see. For the record, I stand by what I wrote. See below.</p>
<p>[Gannon-Guckert’s creepy email to me:]<br />
“Margie:</p>
<p>You wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;On February 25, 2003, the White House began allowing entry by a right-wing<br />
writer called Jeff Gannon, whose real name is James Guckert, as shown by<br />
Secret Service White House access logs obtained through FOIA by<br />
Representatives John Conyers and Louise Slaughter. Gannon’s access was<br />
apparently designed to help the White House handle press briefings and press<br />
conferences by salting the discussion with friendly questions.&#8221; &#8211; This is an<br />
outright lie, there is no evidence to support this claim.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given the extensive manipulation going on in the White House as exposed by<br />
the Libby trial, Guckert &#8212; who declines to answer questions about his work<br />
at the White House &#8212; may also have helped coordinate information on which<br />
journalists would be willing to boost the march to war.&#8221; &#8211; This is also a<br />
lie.  I have never declined to answer questions about my work at the White<br />
House, in fact I have just finished writing a book that discusses the<br />
subject in great detail.  Further, the conspiracy you allege concerning<br />
other journalists is absurd.</p>
<p>&#8220;On March 6, 2003, the president gave a rare White House press conference &#8211;<br />
devoted almost entirely to scripted ‘questions’ inviting administration<br />
remarks about Iraq, submitted for approval beforehand by reporters whom Bush<br />
called upon in the press conference according to a prearranged list, as he<br />
revealed at the time.&#8221; &#8211; This is also a lie.  The President has a list of a<br />
number of reporters from the major news organizations that he usually calls<br />
on first.  The list is to make sure he doesn&#8217;t leave anyone out that MUST be<br />
called on (since doing so would spawn another conspiracy theory.)  There are<br />
NEVER scripted questions from the White House.</p>
<p>Margie, I am gently correcting you in this way for two reasons.  First, the<br />
claims you make are false and libelous and I will take action at some point to correct the record.  Second, when my book is published, you will appear<br />
foolish if you persist in continuing to spread these falsehoods.</p>
<p>Be well,</p>
<p>Jeff Gannon”</p>
<p>[I did indeed email him asking about those WH access logs, and he did indeed refuse to answer questions about his WH access. Then I emailed him back, politely, and he did not answer.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Clinton had his heterosexual Monica. Bush had his homosexual prostitute Jeff. There certainly was a change in the White House once Dubya took over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton had his heterosexual Monica. Bush had his homosexual prostitute Jeff. There certainly was a change in the White House once Dubya took over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azportsider</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>azportsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why you need to pick on Gannon, er, Guckert...well, whatever name he&#039;s using this week. He was no more a fake reporter than anyone else in the White House Stenography Pool, er, Press Corpse. Excepting only Helen Thomas, may the gods bless her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why you need to pick on Gannon, er, Guckert&#8230;well, whatever name he&#8217;s using this week. He was no more a fake reporter than anyone else in the White House Stenography Pool, er, Press Corpse. Excepting only Helen Thomas, may the gods bless her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Weiss</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Nowhere did I see mentioned Gannon&#039;s overnight stays at the White House, at least according to Secret Service in/out records.

I think he and Scotty McClellan had a thing going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowhere did I see mentioned Gannon&#8217;s overnight stays at the White House, at least according to Secret Service in/out records.</p>
<p>I think he and Scotty McClellan had a thing going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StealthBadger.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; As Bob Somerby might say&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>StealthBadger.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; As Bob Somerby might say&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-530</guid>
		<description>[...] with a bit more thought than my snide replies (see the comments section below his copypasta, but someone beat me to it. Good on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with a bit more thought than my snide replies (see the comments section below his copypasta, but someone beat me to it. Good on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StealthBadger</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>StealthBadger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-529</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Does anybody else besides me think there was a connection, and not just political, between Gannon/Guckert and Karl Rove?&lt;/i&gt;

Let&#039;s just say that it would not be surprising for a political operation that uses the most heavy-handed means possible for controlling the media narrative to... use the most heavy-handed means possible for controlling the media narrative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Does anybody else besides me think there was a connection, and not just political, between Gannon/Guckert and Karl Rove?</i></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just say that it would not be surprising for a political operation that uses the most heavy-handed means possible for controlling the media narrative to&#8230; use the most heavy-handed means possible for controlling the media narrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Corto</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Corto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Does anybody else besides me think there was a connection, and not just political, between Gannon/Guckert and Karl Rove?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody else besides me think there was a connection, and not just political, between Gannon/Guckert and Karl Rove?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diana</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-506</guid>
		<description>http://mysite.verizon.net/myk15/bushhugsmanho.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mysite.verizon.net/myk15/bushhugsmanho.html" rel="nofollow">http://mysite.verizon.net/myk15/bushhugsmanho.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Patriot</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Bill Clinton tried to help Monica get a job, it only makes sense that George would try to get his lover a job as a reporter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton tried to help Monica get a job, it only makes sense that George would try to get his lover a job as a reporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/29/was-jeff-gannon-a-fake-white-house-reporter/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Around The Sphere Blogging Roundup October 30, 2007...&lt;/strong&gt;


Our link-fest offering readers  links to blog posts from websites of many different viewpoints. Linked posts do NOT necessarily reflect the opinion of TMV or its writers.
THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CONTROVERSY OVER SAGA OF SCOTT BEA...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Around The Sphere Blogging Roundup October 30, 2007&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Our link-fest offering readers  links to blog posts from websites of many different viewpoints. Linked posts do NOT necessarily reflect the opinion of TMV or its writers.<br />
THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CONTROVERSY OVER SAGA OF SCOTT BEA&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

