













































































































<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About That Debate Last Night</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Ian Welsh

Yes, sad thing is they do work. I happen to think this backfired some though. Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Welsh</p>
<p>Yes, sad thing is they do work. I happen to think this backfired some though. Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Welsh</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/#comment-614</guid>
		<description>Sad thing is, negative campaigning works.  Saying &quot;don&#039;t go negative&quot; is very often saying &quot;lose gracefully&quot;.  I prefer candidates who don&#039;t do that.

And nothing said in the debate is 1/10th as bad as what Clinton will face in a general election.  If she can&#039;t handle it, we&#039;d better know now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad thing is, negative campaigning works.  Saying &#8220;don&#8217;t go negative&#8221; is very often saying &#8220;lose gracefully&#8221;.  I prefer candidates who don&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>And nothing said in the debate is 1/10th as bad as what Clinton will face in a general election.  If she can&#8217;t handle it, we&#8217;d better know now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>As to the Archives, there was a detailed and literate response in a thread at &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailykos.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DKos&lt;/a&gt; which effectively removed that as an issue. I can&#039;t remember the details but it was complicated and a systemic analysis of the system in place for any President.

One thing I remember, I think, is that the decision about the timeframe for release was made in 1994, far before anyone would see the need for an earlier release. I also seem to remember that is was one of 6 choices that had to made. 

I think it&#039;s a non-issue. She&#039;s an attorney and she&#039;s naturally going to oppose a situation where private communications could be analyzed by opponents and &#039;spun&#039; in any direction they wanted.

But I&#039;m not sure that the release is something she could accomplish at this time merely by making a new choice. 

I&#039;ll try and find the post but I&#039;m not good at using the search system at Dkos.

I&#039;m in no one&#039;s camp at this point. Yet I think the field and the moderators demeaned themselves when they attack the frontrunner in such a one-sided manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to the Archives, there was a detailed and literate response in a thread at <a href="http://dailykos.com" rel="nofollow">DKos</a> which effectively removed that as an issue. I can&#8217;t remember the details but it was complicated and a systemic analysis of the system in place for any President.</p>
<p>One thing I remember, I think, is that the decision about the timeframe for release was made in 1994, far before anyone would see the need for an earlier release. I also seem to remember that is was one of 6 choices that had to made. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a non-issue. She&#8217;s an attorney and she&#8217;s naturally going to oppose a situation where private communications could be analyzed by opponents and &#8216;spun&#8217; in any direction they wanted.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not sure that the release is something she could accomplish at this time merely by making a new choice. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try and find the post but I&#8217;m not good at using the search system at Dkos.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in no one&#8217;s camp at this point. Yet I think the field and the moderators demeaned themselves when they attack the frontrunner in such a one-sided manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ironxl84</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>ironxl84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/#comment-586</guid>
		<description>Interesting. &quot;Candidate Calculator&quot; here....

Just answer yes/no/unsure and assign a priority level.

http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html

I wasn&#039;t surprised at my result!

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. &#8220;Candidate Calculator&#8221; here&#8230;.</p>
<p>Just answer yes/no/unsure and assign a priority level.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html</a></p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t surprised at my result!</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alrudder</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>alrudder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Two things to follow are:
1) The National Archives.  If Hillary keeps her White House records under wraps, and still touts her &quot;experience&quot; as first lady, that will continue to dog her.  At the end of the day, she can&#039;t release them, it&#039;d be a distraction.
2) Immigration.  It touches so many issues, hard and soft.  I&#039;m in a small minority thinking she did a good job defending Eliot Spitzer&#039;s plan to issue drivers licenses to undocumented people.  She&#039;s stuck in that very unpopular position now, and she&#039;ll be hammered for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things to follow are:<br />
1) The National Archives.  If Hillary keeps her White House records under wraps, and still touts her &#8220;experience&#8221; as first lady, that will continue to dog her.  At the end of the day, she can&#8217;t release them, it&#8217;d be a distraction.<br />
2) Immigration.  It touches so many issues, hard and soft.  I&#8217;m in a small minority thinking she did a good job defending Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s plan to issue drivers licenses to undocumented people.  She&#8217;s stuck in that very unpopular position now, and she&#8217;ll be hammered for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/#comment-573</guid>
		<description>My newspaper had a piece by Rich Lowry this morning talking trash about Obama, and hyping Hillary. That old right wing strategy of pushing the one they think will be the weakest candidate. 

It&#039;s really weird that they can&#039;t seem to concede that the Dems could run anyone other than Ralph Nader and take it in a walk this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My newspaper had a piece by Rich Lowry this morning talking trash about Obama, and hyping Hillary. That old right wing strategy of pushing the one they think will be the weakest candidate. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really weird that they can&#8217;t seem to concede that the Dems could run anyone other than Ralph Nader and take it in a walk this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About That Debate Last Night &#124; Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>About That Debate Last Night &#124; Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/10/31/about-that-debate-last-night/#comment-569</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Pamela Leavey         This was written by . Posted on Wednesday, October 31, 2007, at 7:18 pm. Filed under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by Pamela Leavey         This was written by . Posted on Wednesday, October 31, 2007, at 7:18 pm. Filed under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

