<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New NIE Report Admits Iran Ended Atomic Arms Work in 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/03/new-nie-report-admits-iran-ended-atomic-arms-work-in-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/03/new-nie-report-admits-iran-ended-atomic-arms-work-in-2003/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hass</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/03/new-nie-report-admits-iran-ended-atomic-arms-work-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>hass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/03/new-nie-report-admits-iran-ended-atomic-arms-work-in-2003/#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>Why should we believe that Iran EVER had a nuclear weapons program at all?

From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iranaffairs.com/iran_affairs/2007/12/iran-nie-report.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IranAffairs.com&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Iran NIE report: Are you lying now, or were you lying then?

If the 2005 NIE report was wrong when it claimed with &quot;high confidence&quot; that Iran had a active nuclear weapons program, why should the 2007 NIE be any more credible when it claims that Iran had a nuclear weapons program until 2003? If Iran really had a nuclear weapons program until 2003 as the new report claims, then why has the IAEA found no evidence of it? &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should we believe that Iran EVER had a nuclear weapons program at all?</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.iranaffairs.com/iran_affairs/2007/12/iran-nie-report.html" rel="nofollow">IranAffairs.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Iran NIE report: Are you lying now, or were you lying then?</p>
<p>If the 2005 NIE report was wrong when it claimed with &#8220;high confidence&#8221; that Iran had a active nuclear weapons program, why should the 2007 NIE be any more credible when it claims that Iran had a nuclear weapons program until 2003? If Iran really had a nuclear weapons program until 2003 as the new report claims, then why has the IAEA found no evidence of it? </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gambling on the Good Word of a Tyrant : The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/03/new-nie-report-admits-iran-ended-atomic-arms-work-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator>Gambling on the Good Word of a Tyrant : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/03/new-nie-report-admits-iran-ended-atomic-arms-work-in-2003/#comment-2011</guid>
		<description>[...] enough to concern us to the level the President is publicly concerned). There are quite a few folks who would have us believe that the President is just hell-bent on taking us to war with Iran, which is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enough to concern us to the level the President is publicly concerned). There are quite a few folks who would have us believe that the President is just hell-bent on taking us to war with Iran, which is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

