













































































































<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Stammers His Way Through Defense of Axelrod&#8217;s Comments on Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/obama-stammers-his-way-through-defense-of-axelrods-comments-on-clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/obama-stammers-his-way-through-defense-of-axelrods-comments-on-clinton/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/obama-stammers-his-way-through-defense-of-axelrods-comments-on-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3353</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/obama-stammers-his-way-through-defense-of-axelrods-comments-on-clinton/#comment-3353</guid>
		<description>Michael

There is no bias here. In my opinion the Obama campaign came off badly on this one from Axelrod&#039;s statement to &lt;a href=&quot;http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/in-the-wake-of-bhuttos-assassination-experience-or-change/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s statement on Bhutto&#039;s assassination&lt;/a&gt; to the way Obama responded to Blitzer. Quite frankly, if any other candidate handled this in the same manner, I would have felt the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael</p>
<p>There is no bias here. In my opinion the Obama campaign came off badly on this one from Axelrod&#8217;s statement to <a href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/in-the-wake-of-bhuttos-assassination-experience-or-change/" rel="nofollow">Obama&#8217;s statement on Bhutto&#8217;s assassination</a> to the way Obama responded to Blitzer. Quite frankly, if any other candidate handled this in the same manner, I would have felt the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/obama-stammers-his-way-through-defense-of-axelrods-comments-on-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3347</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/obama-stammers-his-way-through-defense-of-axelrods-comments-on-clinton/#comment-3347</guid>
		<description>I was on the Obama campaign site and saw that he supports adding troops to both the Army and Marines. I could find nowhere that he says why we need more fighters to do less fighting. I sincerely believe that this same basic position is supported by Clinton, Dodd, Biden, and Edwards, at a minimum.

I could not disagree more. And I mean I don&#039;t support either the policy or the judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on the Obama campaign site and saw that he supports adding troops to both the Army and Marines. I could find nowhere that he says why we need more fighters to do less fighting. I sincerely believe that this same basic position is supported by Clinton, Dodd, Biden, and Edwards, at a minimum.</p>
<p>I could not disagree more. And I mean I don&#8217;t support either the policy or the judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/obama-stammers-his-way-through-defense-of-axelrods-comments-on-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3344</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/28/obama-stammers-his-way-through-defense-of-axelrods-comments-on-clinton/#comment-3344</guid>
		<description>Your bias is pathetically blatant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your bias is pathetically blatant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

