<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Durbin&#8217;s Hypocrisy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Democratic Daily</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-5452</link>
		<dc:creator>The Democratic Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-5452</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Quiz Show on Iraq...&lt;/strong&gt;

Go read &#8220;The Quiz Show on Iraq&#8221; and take the quiz. It&#8217;s an eye-opener and the bottom line is &#8220;for any of them (especially one particular candidate) to disingenuously claim to have been consistently anti-war would be more than la...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Quiz Show on Iraq&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Go read &#8220;The Quiz Show on Iraq&#8221; and take the quiz. It&#8217;s an eye-opener and the bottom line is &#8220;for any of them (especially one particular candidate) to disingenuously claim to have been consistently anti-war would be more than la&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-4111</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-4111</guid>
		<description>morris1030: I&#039;m with you. Let&#039;s disqualify everyone who has ever used mind altering substances from voting this year. I&#039;m pretty sure that the final outcome will be 2 to 1, but I&#039;m not sure who the winner will be. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>morris1030: I&#8217;m with you. Let&#8217;s disqualify everyone who has ever used mind altering substances from voting this year. I&#8217;m pretty sure that the final outcome will be 2 to 1, but I&#8217;m not sure who the winner will be. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morris1030</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-4100</link>
		<dc:creator>morris1030</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-4100</guid>
		<description>There is no question that Clinton&#039;s remark was more than warranted. After 35 years of work in support of black issues, she was drawing a very important distinction.

  Without  successful legislation Dr. King&#039;s dream would not have brought the Civil Rights Act into a reality. Hillary did not diminish the efforts of Dr King and the thousands who helped bring this dream into reality.

In drawing this distinction she emphasized correctly that it will take a capable and experienced President to enact successful progressive legislation.

The torrent of anger [and hate] emanating from Obama&#039;s side reveals an attitude that will not help the Democratic party to victory.  To begin with...it was ok to mention Bush&#039;s use of cocaine and alchohol and question his behavior?  I really cannot understand how Obama expects to admitting to drug use, and expects no one to question this?

In other words is there so much naivete or hubris  here that Obama  believes he can continue to play on young voter&#039;s feelings of guilt?  Surely we all need redemption from the atrocities visited on the blacks in this country. But playing the race card will catch up with him.

I marched in Selma. Yet Isee no reason why Obama should have a scrubbed record of his votes and accomplishments[?] in Illinois. His ties to recently indicted Rezko with relation to a sweetheart deal made between himself and Rezko to enlarge his backyard property at half of it&#039;s worth  caught up with Obama.       He had to return $11.500 in Rezko donations, but even after he knew Feds were investigating this transaction he closed on his property the same day Rita Rezko [neighbor] did.

Obama&#039;s response: &quot; I made a mistake.&quot;  His Illinois records as a part time State Senator are missing. His answer: &quot;I never thought it would be important and  now it&#039;s too late to retreive them and too costly.  Sure.

Obama Mr. expects his ties to lobbyists [republican] in that legislature to die. His weekly Thursday night poker games with lobbyist  were all part of playing ball with the powerful republican dominated Assembly. Pritzker billions are backing Obama. Pritzkers run Hyatt,nursing homes,medical and financial, travel,and on.  The Feds closed down 2 of their failing S&amp;L&#039;s, and the IRS successfully sued re: income tax envasion.

His backstory is highly protected, and the Press?? Where are they?
Penny Pritzker is Finance Director of his campaign and has to be pressured to reveal Obama&#039;s  still hidden donors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no question that Clinton&#8217;s remark was more than warranted. After 35 years of work in support of black issues, she was drawing a very important distinction.</p>
<p>  Without  successful legislation Dr. King&#8217;s dream would not have brought the Civil Rights Act into a reality. Hillary did not diminish the efforts of Dr King and the thousands who helped bring this dream into reality.</p>
<p>In drawing this distinction she emphasized correctly that it will take a capable and experienced President to enact successful progressive legislation.</p>
<p>The torrent of anger [and hate] emanating from Obama&#8217;s side reveals an attitude that will not help the Democratic party to victory.  To begin with&#8230;it was ok to mention Bush&#8217;s use of cocaine and alchohol and question his behavior?  I really cannot understand how Obama expects to admitting to drug use, and expects no one to question this?</p>
<p>In other words is there so much naivete or hubris  here that Obama  believes he can continue to play on young voter&#8217;s feelings of guilt?  Surely we all need redemption from the atrocities visited on the blacks in this country. But playing the race card will catch up with him.</p>
<p>I marched in Selma. Yet Isee no reason why Obama should have a scrubbed record of his votes and accomplishments[?] in Illinois. His ties to recently indicted Rezko with relation to a sweetheart deal made between himself and Rezko to enlarge his backyard property at half of it&#8217;s worth  caught up with Obama.       He had to return $11.500 in Rezko donations, but even after he knew Feds were investigating this transaction he closed on his property the same day Rita Rezko [neighbor] did.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s response: &#8221; I made a mistake.&#8221;  His Illinois records as a part time State Senator are missing. His answer: &#8220;I never thought it would be important and  now it&#8217;s too late to retreive them and too costly.  Sure.</p>
<p>Obama Mr. expects his ties to lobbyists [republican] in that legislature to die. His weekly Thursday night poker games with lobbyist  were all part of playing ball with the powerful republican dominated Assembly. Pritzker billions are backing Obama. Pritzkers run Hyatt,nursing homes,medical and financial, travel,and on.  The Feds closed down 2 of their failing S&amp;L&#8217;s, and the IRS successfully sued re: income tax envasion.</p>
<p>His backstory is highly protected, and the Press?? Where are they?<br />
Penny Pritzker is Finance Director of his campaign and has to be pressured to reveal Obama&#8217;s  still hidden donors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-4081</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-4081</guid>
		<description>Beachmom

Clinton isn&#039;t claiming that she &quot;led on Iraq&quot; in the past. She&#039;s pointing to the fact that Obama&#039;s record in the Senate is exactly like hers. I think she has a right to do this. 

Obama&#039;s claims to be the anti-war candidate are not consistent with his record and it&#039;s not just Kerry Feingold. 

We&#039;ll have to disagree on this, because I&#039;m not drinking the Hillary Hater koolaid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beachmom</p>
<p>Clinton isn&#8217;t claiming that she &#8220;led on Iraq&#8221; in the past. She&#8217;s pointing to the fact that Obama&#8217;s record in the Senate is exactly like hers. I think she has a right to do this. </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s claims to be the anti-war candidate are not consistent with his record and it&#8217;s not just Kerry Feingold. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll have to disagree on this, because I&#8217;m not drinking the Hillary Hater koolaid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Democratic Daily</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-4079</link>
		<dc:creator>The Democratic Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-4079</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Clinton - Obama Iraq Feud...&lt;/strong&gt;

Apparently, Hillary Clinton who has not made being an &#8220;anti-war&#8221; candidate is not supposed to question the record of Barack Obama who has made this his platform. To do so is an &#8220;attack&#8221; or a &#8220;smear.&#8221; That&#8217;s lud...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Clinton &#8211; Obama Iraq Feud&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Apparently, Hillary Clinton who has not made being an &#8220;anti-war&#8221; candidate is not supposed to question the record of Barack Obama who has made this his platform. To do so is an &#8220;attack&#8221; or a &#8220;smear.&#8221; That&#8217;s lud&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beachmom</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-4077</link>
		<dc:creator>beachmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-4077</guid>
		<description>Except Clinton has been DEAD WRONG every step of the way on Iraq, only finally, finally, changing her position in the spring of &#039;08 when upon checking the polling, realized she HAD to.  You can be critical of Obama on that vote -- that&#039;s fair game.  But Hillary never led on Iraq.  At least Obama came out with an Iraq plan at the end of &#039;06 which did, in fact, embrace the principles of the K/F amendment.  Hillary didn&#039;t back the timetable until the spring when Kerry persuaded a majority of Dems to support it -- called the Reid amendment -- which was vetoed by the president.

Hillary has no leg to stand on in regards to Iraq.  She and her campaign have zero credibility to attack Obama when they have been so wrong, and she won&#039;t even apologize for her vote!  Let&#039;s not even talk about how Bill LAUDED Bush&#039;s handling of the Iraq War in 2004.  Some help for our nominee, Bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except Clinton has been DEAD WRONG every step of the way on Iraq, only finally, finally, changing her position in the spring of &#8217;08 when upon checking the polling, realized she HAD to.  You can be critical of Obama on that vote &#8212; that&#8217;s fair game.  But Hillary never led on Iraq.  At least Obama came out with an Iraq plan at the end of &#8217;06 which did, in fact, embrace the principles of the K/F amendment.  Hillary didn&#8217;t back the timetable until the spring when Kerry persuaded a majority of Dems to support it &#8212; called the Reid amendment &#8212; which was vetoed by the president.</p>
<p>Hillary has no leg to stand on in regards to Iraq.  She and her campaign have zero credibility to attack Obama when they have been so wrong, and she won&#8217;t even apologize for her vote!  Let&#8217;s not even talk about how Bill LAUDED Bush&#8217;s handling of the Iraq War in 2004.  Some help for our nominee, Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-4041</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-4041</guid>
		<description>VWCAT

I will also add that drawing attention to someone&#039;s voting record or stance on the issues is not an out right attack. It&#039;s part and parcel of a political campaign. 

The conclusion I reached about Obama on Iraq is one I reached a year ago, before Kerry announced he was not going to run. I felt then it was hyprocritical for Obama to call himself an anti-war candidate because he did not support Kerry Feingold and I feel the same way now.

Last but not least as for not voting for the nominee -- your choice. I doubt Senator Obama will do what you are threatening or would want his supporters to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VWCAT</p>
<p>I will also add that drawing attention to someone&#8217;s voting record or stance on the issues is not an out right attack. It&#8217;s part and parcel of a political campaign. </p>
<p>The conclusion I reached about Obama on Iraq is one I reached a year ago, before Kerry announced he was not going to run. I felt then it was hyprocritical for Obama to call himself an anti-war candidate because he did not support Kerry Feingold and I feel the same way now.</p>
<p>Last but not least as for not voting for the nominee &#8212; your choice. I doubt Senator Obama will do what you are threatening or would want his supporters to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-4037</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-4037</guid>
		<description>VWCat

I&#039;ve been blogging long enough to know what Obama&#039;s record is on Iraq. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VWCat</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been blogging long enough to know what Obama&#8217;s record is on Iraq. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vwcat</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>vwcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/01/13/durbins-hypocrisy/#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>Dick Durbin is my senator and not a hypocrite.
He is right in calling HRC on her outright lying and distortions.
If you want to know about Obama&#039;s stand on the war, google would help some.
but, here, for you I have done it for you:

http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/barack-obamas-march-2003-public-statements-opposing-the-iraq-war/

All the information is at this link.

As for HRC, if she is the nominee, after her repugnant behavior of the past few weeks, I will become an independent and vote 3rd party or stay home.  But, I will never give my vote to someone like her.
It would be the same as voting for G. Bush or K. Rove.;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick Durbin is my senator and not a hypocrite.<br />
He is right in calling HRC on her outright lying and distortions.<br />
If you want to know about Obama&#8217;s stand on the war, google would help some.<br />
but, here, for you I have done it for you:</p>
<p><a href="http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/barack-obamas-march-2003-public-statements-opposing-the-iraq-war/" rel="nofollow">http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/barack-obamas-march-2003-public-statements-opposing-the-iraq-war/</a></p>
<p>All the information is at this link.</p>
<p>As for HRC, if she is the nominee, after her repugnant behavior of the past few weeks, I will become an independent and vote 3rd party or stay home.  But, I will never give my vote to someone like her.<br />
It would be the same as voting for G. Bush or K. Rove.;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

