Your link supports the claims of the Obama campaign. Obama does not take money from lobbyists. Can Cliinton make the same claim? NO SHE CAN’T. Thank you for proving my point.

So now Obama is the son of privilege? Why distort things? He was raised by a single mom in decidedly middle class surroundings. Even upon graduation from Harvard, he made $13,000 a year as a community organizer. Unlike Hillary, he hasn’t ridden any coat tails or lived in the bubble of the hyper connected for the last 35 years. NO HE HASN’T.

The mainstream media is where most people get their info. We can’t rely on blogs because as your assertion about Obama’s privileged upbringing shows, there’s more spin here than at the Maytag Quality Control Lab.

Funny you should bring up Obama and Lobbyists.

Here you go: Bundlers for Barack Obama Who Have Registered as Federal Lobbyists

Oh, and I wouldn’t take everything you hear in the news as truth. The media is controlled by the noise machine. If you bothered to read the first link in the you would get that.

Funny thing about those insiders priveleged Clintons, you know she attracts more lower and middle income voters than Obama. And seems he’s led a rather priveleged life too.

Good gracious put down the Bam flavored KoolAid Brian.

You are right about the young voters not knowing much about the past few decades of history. The schools don’t teach much on it – my daughter graduated high school last June.

Also the there’s a piece here on what Obama said about getting by Clinton’s research team.

He’s dreaming if he thinks he’s seen all there is that can get thrown at him

Geoge W Bush won the election because this “liberal media” made Gore out to be a serial liar and Kerry was a A traitor who didn’t earn his metals.If you think that what Bill Clinton said was swiftboating(since when is stating a FACT is swiftboating?) then sit back and watch what they can do to Arfrican-American with a name that sounds like Osama Husein

It is not necessary to argue tit-for-tat with fantasy-ridden Obama supporters.

It is not about Barry’s ’stated positions,’ it is about his prime sponsors and their intentions.

Barry Obama’s lavish promotion in the media and access to limitless funds suggests that he is the Establishment’s intended losing Dem
candidate this year.

And lotsa luck proving otherwise, since the Tony Rezko-Organized Crime dossier has now leaked in the British press.

Corporate media in the USA will give Barry a pass–for awhile– in the hope that he can knock out Hillary. Then, he is history.

As such, Obama is, today, a stalking horse for billionaire Bloomberg’s candidacy–Wall Street’s choice–until proven otherwise.

Mussolini-imitator Bloomberg, of course, is the checkbook who re-elected Joe ‘Nuke Iran’ Lieberman to the US Senate. And who hired Caroline Kennedy to help him privatize NYC’s schools.

Fegela Mike espouses a bi-partisan kind of fascism.

You totally missed the point. That’s my point. The Ferrar point was hypothetical. The drug points were based on facts about drug use and the fact that the Obama team spun it as a racist comment. It was not. Drug use is prevelent in all in many demographics in this country. It’s not a race specific issue.

The Clintons were not engaging in swift boating to say so diminishes the reality of what swift boating is and what John Kerry went through at the hands of the swift boaters.

2) No one from the Obama camp has made any Geraldine Ferrar/womens references! That’s the point!!!

3) Okay, let me get this right, Chicago has a rep for dirty politics. Obama is from Chicago. Therefore Obama is a dirty politician.

1) I wasn’t aware that “drug use” was a race indictive issue.

It’s not.

Drug use is prevelent among a broad spectrum of demographics in this country, so if any thing the Obama camp turned the issue into race, because it was never said by the Clinton campaign surrogate, Bill Shaheen that brought it up, that it was a race issue.

2) I look at the Jackson statement from Bill Clinton thusly: If someone from the Obama camp noted that Hillary won in a state that say Geraldine Ferrar won in, would it be called a sexist statement? I doubt it.

3) For all the cries of indignance from Obama supporters that Clinton’s played the race card, which they did not in my opinion, Obama certainly has benefited from being the Black candidate. Don’t ya think?

Chicago politicians have been doing Rove for decades and that’s where Obama learned to play the game. Get a clue.

Obama has been playing dirty for months now. But all you Obama supporters do is whine that it’s all the Clintons. That is bull shit. Sheer, utter bull shit.

The Clintons were doing Rove before Rove was doing Rove.