













































































































<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Misleads on Clinton&#8217;s Positions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/02/14/obama-misleads-on-clintons-positions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/02/14/obama-misleads-on-clintons-positions/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/02/14/obama-misleads-on-clintons-positions/comment-page-1/#comment-5788</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/02/14/obama-misleads-on-clintons-positions/#comment-5788</guid>
		<description>There has been a dramatic increase in world trade, globalization, or whtever you want to call it. Given the alternative, I believe this to be a positive trend. Prosperity clearly needs to be widely spread, and people making things in Third World countries to be sold in the few developed parts of the planet is a necessary part of the process. My personal impression is that NAFTA has facilitated this, and, as such, might be labeled a &quot;necessary evil&quot;. This is a complicated area and it has ben true in the past that the phrase &quot;labor and environmental protections&quot; has been code for protectionism.

Like so much, the devil is in the details. However, when I hear things simplified to the point of &quot;support for NAFTA - bad&quot; I get nervous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a dramatic increase in world trade, globalization, or whtever you want to call it. Given the alternative, I believe this to be a positive trend. Prosperity clearly needs to be widely spread, and people making things in Third World countries to be sold in the few developed parts of the planet is a necessary part of the process. My personal impression is that NAFTA has facilitated this, and, as such, might be labeled a &#8220;necessary evil&#8221;. This is a complicated area and it has ben true in the past that the phrase &#8220;labor and environmental protections&#8221; has been code for protectionism.</p>
<p>Like so much, the devil is in the details. However, when I hear things simplified to the point of &#8220;support for NAFTA &#8211; bad&#8221; I get nervous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/02/14/obama-misleads-on-clintons-positions/comment-page-1/#comment-5771</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/02/14/obama-misleads-on-clintons-positions/#comment-5771</guid>
		<description>I have said for months, to you and others, Obama is an &lt;strong&gt;old school politician&lt;/strong&gt; that&#039;s using old school techniques including misleading statements, passive aggressive language and cash to get votes.

He knew, apparently, or at least planned for the Superdelegate race for &lt;strong&gt;2 years&lt;/strong&gt;. 

&lt;strong&gt;Bullshit this is a &#039;new style, new era&#039; guy&lt;/strong&gt;. This is a Tony Robbins graduate, no bad thing in itself, that has learned how to project a specfic image and has retained the best product marketing team in the Biz.

And the product ISN&quot;T Obama....it is &#039;change&#039; and &#039;hope&#039;. Words that means nothing of substance. &lt;strong&gt;They are emotional appeals.&lt;/strong&gt; Appeals at call to the frustration we all feel.

&lt;strong&gt;He&#039;s old school in every sense of the word. And this tactic, quite effectively done, for two years proves it.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have said for months, to you and others, Obama is an <strong>old school politician</strong> that&#8217;s using old school techniques including misleading statements, passive aggressive language and cash to get votes.</p>
<p>He knew, apparently, or at least planned for the Superdelegate race for <strong>2 years</strong>. </p>
<p><strong>Bullshit this is a &#8216;new style, new era&#8217; guy</strong>. This is a Tony Robbins graduate, no bad thing in itself, that has learned how to project a specfic image and has retained the best product marketing team in the Biz.</p>
<p>And the product ISN&#8221;T Obama&#8230;.it is &#8216;change&#8217; and &#8216;hope&#8217;. Words that means nothing of substance. <strong>They are emotional appeals.</strong> Appeals at call to the frustration we all feel.</p>
<p><strong>He&#8217;s old school in every sense of the word. And this tactic, quite effectively done, for two years proves it.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

