<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama General Counsel Crashes Clinton Press Call On Voting Irregularities In Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6692</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/#comment-6692</guid>
		<description>Lee Church

Obviously you are not willing to ditch your sexism. Thank you for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Church</p>
<p>Obviously you are not willing to ditch your sexism. Thank you for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6691</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/#comment-6691</guid>
		<description>Lee Church: How about if we call it &quot;affirmative action&quot; instead of &quot;sexism&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Church: How about if we call it &#8220;affirmative action&#8221; instead of &#8220;sexism&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Church</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6685</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/#comment-6685</guid>
		<description>the ad for menforhillary.org you have on this web site is personally offensive.

1) you can&#039;t argue that gender should not determine whom is elected and argue that a woman should be elected at the same time.   If one argues that gender doesn&#039;t matter, then don&#039;t say it does.

2) the accusation that the reader of the ad is sexist (&quot;ditch your sexism now&quot;) is offensive, especially considering that the following line says &quot;elect a qualified woman now&quot;.  They could say &quot;elect a qualified person now&quot;.. sure.. but by using &quot;woman&quot; it&#039;s sexist.  Certainly we would not accept such hate speech if &quot;man&quot; were substituted for &quot;woman&quot;.  I find it ironic that a sexist ad calls me a sexist.  In addition by attempting to claim being a woman iis nherently superior, the notion of &quot;equality&quot; is undermined.  You can&#039;t argue you are &quot;superior&quot; and &quot;equal&quot; at the same time.  The ad does women&#039;s rights a huge disservice as a secondary result.

3) The implication is that Hillary is qualified.  Given the number of years she has been in elected office is less than either McCain or Obama, it&#039;s a claim that is tough to support.  Indeed the claim is not supported. 

Racist and sexist ads should not be accepted by this, or any other media, whether from the candidates themselves, their supporters, or any third party.

By accepting revenue from these ads, and thus making money from sexist activities this site itself becomes a party to it.

I sugget you think about what you do and how you conduct yourselves.  You are known by the company you keep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the ad for menforhillary.org you have on this web site is personally offensive.</p>
<p>1) you can&#8217;t argue that gender should not determine whom is elected and argue that a woman should be elected at the same time.   If one argues that gender doesn&#8217;t matter, then don&#8217;t say it does.</p>
<p>2) the accusation that the reader of the ad is sexist (&#8220;ditch your sexism now&#8221;) is offensive, especially considering that the following line says &#8220;elect a qualified woman now&#8221;.  They could say &#8220;elect a qualified person now&#8221;.. sure.. but by using &#8220;woman&#8221; it&#8217;s sexist.  Certainly we would not accept such hate speech if &#8220;man&#8221; were substituted for &#8220;woman&#8221;.  I find it ironic that a sexist ad calls me a sexist.  In addition by attempting to claim being a woman iis nherently superior, the notion of &#8220;equality&#8221; is undermined.  You can&#8217;t argue you are &#8220;superior&#8221; and &#8220;equal&#8221; at the same time.  The ad does women&#8217;s rights a huge disservice as a secondary result.</p>
<p>3) The implication is that Hillary is qualified.  Given the number of years she has been in elected office is less than either McCain or Obama, it&#8217;s a claim that is tough to support.  Indeed the claim is not supported. </p>
<p>Racist and sexist ads should not be accepted by this, or any other media, whether from the candidates themselves, their supporters, or any third party.</p>
<p>By accepting revenue from these ads, and thus making money from sexist activities this site itself becomes a party to it.</p>
<p>I sugget you think about what you do and how you conduct yourselves.  You are known by the company you keep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerrydtx</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6675</link>
		<dc:creator>jerrydtx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/#comment-6675</guid>
		<description>I live in Texas.  The voting irregularity I witnessed was people being signed up as Obama voters at the caucus without anyone checking that they had actually voted during the day.

There are many other horror stories:  out of state voters voting in the precincts, sheets of names being passed out of people not at the caucuses

I am saddened to see that Democrats would cheat each other to win an election.  Senator Obama knows that his campaign is being extremely aggressive at these caucauses.  Yet he is turning a blind eye to the cheating and lack of ethics.  If this doesn&#039;t smack of a lack of ethics I&#039;m don&#039;t know what does?  What kind of President will he make?  :(  Please vote for Senator Clinton.  The proof is in the pudding and right now the pudding is shark infested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Texas.  The voting irregularity I witnessed was people being signed up as Obama voters at the caucus without anyone checking that they had actually voted during the day.</p>
<p>There are many other horror stories:  out of state voters voting in the precincts, sheets of names being passed out of people not at the caucuses</p>
<p>I am saddened to see that Democrats would cheat each other to win an election.  Senator Obama knows that his campaign is being extremely aggressive at these caucauses.  Yet he is turning a blind eye to the cheating and lack of ethics.  If this doesn&#8217;t smack of a lack of ethics I&#8217;m don&#8217;t know what does?  What kind of President will he make?  <img src='http://thedemocraticdaily.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Please vote for Senator Clinton.  The proof is in the pudding and right now the pudding is shark infested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Democratic Daily</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6648</link>
		<dc:creator>The Democratic Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/#comment-6648</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;HRC: Last Night Victories And An Image From Yesteryear...&lt;/strong&gt;

 Last night&#8217;s results created a momentum that Senator Clinton could use very effectively. This image from WWII seemed a reasonable way to set off on the next 7 weeks to Pennsylvania. 
After the allegations detailed in Pam&#8217;s article and the ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HRC: Last Night Victories And An Image From Yesteryear&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Last night&#8217;s results created a momentum that Senator Clinton could use very effectively. This image from WWII seemed a reasonable way to set off on the next 7 weeks to Pennsylvania.<br />
After the allegations detailed in Pam&#8217;s article and the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d think someone with a mic would have challenged the propriety of crashing a candidate conference call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think someone with a mic would have challenged the propriety of crashing a candidate conference call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barack Obama Chronicles &#187; Archive &#187; Obama General Counsel Crashes Clinton Press Call On Voting Irregularities In Texas</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6633</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack Obama Chronicles &#187; Archive &#187; Obama General Counsel Crashes Clinton Press Call On Voting Irregularities In Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/04/obama-general-counsel-crashes-clinton-press-call-on-voting-irregularities-in-texas/#comment-6633</guid>
		<description>[...] The Democratic Daily put an intriguing blog post on Obama General Counsel Crashes Clinton Press Call On Voting Irregularities In Texas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Democratic Daily put an intriguing blog post on Obama General Counsel Crashes Clinton Press Call On Voting Irregularities In Texas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.395 seconds -->
