<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Reaction to Obama&#8217;s Speech: Two Questions for Senator Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:50:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peace Out For Unity</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7410</link>
		<dc:creator>Peace Out For Unity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/#comment-7410</guid>
		<description>Why was Obama disingenous in the first interview when asked specifically by Anderson Cooper about his pastor?Days later the speech on 3/18/08? Clinton leading per NewsMax.com 47% to 45%.A compromise of integrity and honesty for political gain and the Obama&#039;s campaign is supporting real change you can count on?The yankee,doodle blew the high wind off the frying pan and there ain&#039;t no chickens roosting here! The hen eggs however are cracked wide open! Swing out sister break out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was Obama disingenous in the first interview when asked specifically by Anderson Cooper about his pastor?Days later the speech on 3/18/08? Clinton leading per NewsMax.com 47% to 45%.A compromise of integrity and honesty for political gain and the Obama&#8217;s campaign is supporting real change you can count on?The yankee,doodle blew the high wind off the frying pan and there ain&#8217;t no chickens roosting here! The hen eggs however are cracked wide open! Swing out sister break out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjerryberg</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7383</link>
		<dc:creator>bjerryberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/#comment-7383</guid>
		<description>Clinton Campaign Says Obama Disenfranchising Michigan and Florida Voters

Speaking in Detroit this morning, Hillary Clinton called for either counting the votes already cast in the early Michigan and Florida primaries, or for holding &quot;new, full and fair elections&quot; -- and she demanded that Barack Obama support this.

Yesterday, Clinton campaign representatives accused Obama&#039;s campaign of dragging their feet by refusing to support a re-run of the Michigan and Florida primaries; they characterized this as an effort by the Obama campaign &quot;to disenfranchise the voters of Michigan and Florida.&quot; And they warned that if this happens, it will give the Republicans a huge opening in those states in the November general elections.

LaRouche PAC notes that any failure to resolve the Florida and Michigan situation also provides an opening for Hedge Fund Dems like  Nancy Pelosi and Al Gore to &quot;broker&quot; the convention as they have threatened to do, in such a manner as to ensure that Hillary Clinton does not get the nomination -- which otherwise she seems likely to win, given the plethora of  scandals facing Sen. Obama.

In Michigan, key legislators have been saying they can&#039;t pass proposed legislation for a new primary without the agreement of both campaigns and the Democratic National Committee--which has signed on--but Obama&#039;s campaign will not agree to it. 

Mrs. Clinton was in Michigan to meet with legislators concerning the draft legislation, which, she said, she supports, and the DNC also supports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton Campaign Says Obama Disenfranchising Michigan and Florida Voters</p>
<p>Speaking in Detroit this morning, Hillary Clinton called for either counting the votes already cast in the early Michigan and Florida primaries, or for holding &#8220;new, full and fair elections&#8221; &#8212; and she demanded that Barack Obama support this.</p>
<p>Yesterday, Clinton campaign representatives accused Obama&#8217;s campaign of dragging their feet by refusing to support a re-run of the Michigan and Florida primaries; they characterized this as an effort by the Obama campaign &#8220;to disenfranchise the voters of Michigan and Florida.&#8221; And they warned that if this happens, it will give the Republicans a huge opening in those states in the November general elections.</p>
<p>LaRouche PAC notes that any failure to resolve the Florida and Michigan situation also provides an opening for Hedge Fund Dems like  Nancy Pelosi and Al Gore to &#8220;broker&#8221; the convention as they have threatened to do, in such a manner as to ensure that Hillary Clinton does not get the nomination &#8212; which otherwise she seems likely to win, given the plethora of  scandals facing Sen. Obama.</p>
<p>In Michigan, key legislators have been saying they can&#8217;t pass proposed legislation for a new primary without the agreement of both campaigns and the Democratic National Committee&#8211;which has signed on&#8211;but Obama&#8217;s campaign will not agree to it. </p>
<p>Mrs. Clinton was in Michigan to meet with legislators concerning the draft legislation, which, she said, she supports, and the DNC also supports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7381</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/#comment-7381</guid>
		<description>Alrudder

Parsing is word that a lot of bloggers use to describe the picking apart of speeches, news, etc.. I haven&#039;t really said anything much on my opinion of the speech because I have too much else on my plate in the past couple of days and have been working very hard and blogging very little. That unfortunately will continue to be the case until I catch up with some critical work I must get finished that has been put off for a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alrudder</p>
<p>Parsing is word that a lot of bloggers use to describe the picking apart of speeches, news, etc.. I haven&#8217;t really said anything much on my opinion of the speech because I have too much else on my plate in the past couple of days and have been working very hard and blogging very little. That unfortunately will continue to be the case until I catch up with some critical work I must get finished that has been put off for a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjerryberg</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7377</link>
		<dc:creator>bjerryberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/#comment-7377</guid>
		<description>I suspect the Clinton supporter cited is Lanny Davis, the former White House aide, who like myself is also a former Maryland resident. Hi Lanny!

But why split hairs? We all make typos.

The more important matter is why parse this &#039;inside the beltway&#039; stuff, at all?

It is best to minimize the horse-race campaign stuff.  The economy is in a crisis not seen in several hundred years.

Obama is  irrelevant to the needed debate. The vacuous themes of his campaign and the pre-programmed scandals assure it. 

Clinton is only relevant to the extent she continues to emphasize real world issues like freezing home foreclosures. Solutions that protect the general welfare rather than bailing out the predators are required.

The Fed not only loaned JP Morgan Chase the money to gobble up  the now worthless Wall St. giant,  Bear Stearns, they GUARANTEED $30 Billion of Bearn, Stearns bad financial paper. Welcome to Bailout City--the capital of the USA. 

 Besides being illegal, this is bad precedent. 

The public treasury is expected to make good the rest of the Quadrillions of dollars of worthless mortgage securities, derivatives and other gambling debts, out there,  at face value? 

The Fed&#039;s guarantee to JP Morgan Chase  is the essence of fascism. Financial predators get to play in a casino where they cannot lose--only the general public can.

 Beware of pols who speak of bringing us together to face shared sacrifice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the Clinton supporter cited is Lanny Davis, the former White House aide, who like myself is also a former Maryland resident. Hi Lanny!</p>
<p>But why split hairs? We all make typos.</p>
<p>The more important matter is why parse this &#8216;inside the beltway&#8217; stuff, at all?</p>
<p>It is best to minimize the horse-race campaign stuff.  The economy is in a crisis not seen in several hundred years.</p>
<p>Obama is  irrelevant to the needed debate. The vacuous themes of his campaign and the pre-programmed scandals assure it. </p>
<p>Clinton is only relevant to the extent she continues to emphasize real world issues like freezing home foreclosures. Solutions that protect the general welfare rather than bailing out the predators are required.</p>
<p>The Fed not only loaned JP Morgan Chase the money to gobble up  the now worthless Wall St. giant,  Bear Stearns, they GUARANTEED $30 Billion of Bearn, Stearns bad financial paper. Welcome to Bailout City&#8211;the capital of the USA. </p>
<p> Besides being illegal, this is bad precedent. </p>
<p>The public treasury is expected to make good the rest of the Quadrillions of dollars of worthless mortgage securities, derivatives and other gambling debts, out there,  at face value? </p>
<p>The Fed&#8217;s guarantee to JP Morgan Chase  is the essence of fascism. Financial predators get to play in a casino where they cannot lose&#8211;only the general public can.</p>
<p> Beware of pols who speak of bringing us together to face shared sacrifice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proseandpromise</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7375</link>
		<dc:creator>proseandpromise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/#comment-7375</guid>
		<description>Comparing Rev. Wright&#039;s comments to that of the KKK is ludicrous.  McCain
probably will make a non-thinking GOP type argument like that.  But progressives
shouldn&#039;t help him make it!  Come on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing Rev. Wright&#8217;s comments to that of the KKK is ludicrous.  McCain<br />
probably will make a non-thinking GOP type argument like that.  But progressives<br />
shouldn&#8217;t help him make it!  Come on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alrudder</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7369</link>
		<dc:creator>alrudder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/#comment-7369</guid>
		<description>Pamela,
   you used the word &quot;parsing&quot; earlier.  I still haven&#039;t read what you actually thought of the speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela,<br />
   you used the word &#8220;parsing&#8221; earlier.  I still haven&#8217;t read what you actually thought of the speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Prophet</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7365</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Prophet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/19/more-reaction-to-obamas-speech-two-questions-for-senator-obama/#comment-7365</guid>
		<description>Barack Obama gave a good speech on race, but it&#039;s being argued that it was designed to distract attention from much more damaging non-racial aspects of his THEOLOGY. See:
http://christianprophecy.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama gave a good speech on race, but it&#8217;s being argued that it was designed to distract attention from much more damaging non-racial aspects of his THEOLOGY. See:<br />
<a href="http://christianprophecy.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://christianprophecy.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

