<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Much For Obama&#8217;s Bi-Partisan Unity Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:50:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldH2Owi</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8388</link>
		<dc:creator>coldH2Owi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8388</guid>
		<description>Stuart O&#039;Neill:
You&#039;re right, I&#039;m a DFH who was against this damned war from the beginning.  Oh, I forgot, being right means a person is not serious.  Thank you for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart O&#8217;Neill:<br />
You&#8217;re right, I&#8217;m a DFH who was against this damned war from the beginning.  Oh, I forgot, being right means a person is not serious.  Thank you for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8387</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8387</guid>
		<description>cold, be specific -- what &quot;error&quot; are you talking about?  Sending out a press release without clearing it past the other office?

Regards Scaife, I&#039;m not badmouthing Obama for wanting to talk to anyone.  I&#039;m saying that Obama supporters who deride her desicion to sit down with the guy and talk, and then turn around and support Obama&#039;s plan to talk to damned near anyone are being hypocritical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cold, be specific &#8212; what &#8220;error&#8221; are you talking about?  Sending out a press release without clearing it past the other office?</p>
<p>Regards Scaife, I&#8217;m not badmouthing Obama for wanting to talk to anyone.  I&#8217;m saying that Obama supporters who deride her desicion to sit down with the guy and talk, and then turn around and support Obama&#8217;s plan to talk to damned near anyone are being hypocritical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8377</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8377</guid>
		<description>Cold says: &lt;blockquote&gt;Sen. Clinton &amp; Sen. Obama are the people’s enemy,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ok, that&#039;s enough info for me to stop listening to that source as a serious analyst. 

Janis: Loved your first post above with a PR/media  view. Absolutely dead on.  You do not treat the senior member of a relationship which in terms of Senate power and seniority, (a serious matter in the Senate), as if they didn&#039;t exist. Hell, you don&#039;t do that in any relationship.

That doesn&#039;t mean McCain is any better for America, it means that the alliance must be treated as such. Hell, Obama choose McCain #1 visceral issue then started acting like he, Obama, was in charge. Bad move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cold says:<br />
<blockquote>Sen. Clinton &#038; Sen. Obama are the people’s enemy,</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok, that&#8217;s enough info for me to stop listening to that source as a serious analyst. </p>
<p>Janis: Loved your first post above with a PR/media  view. Absolutely dead on.  You do not treat the senior member of a relationship which in terms of Senate power and seniority, (a serious matter in the Senate), as if they didn&#8217;t exist. Hell, you don&#8217;t do that in any relationship.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean McCain is any better for America, it means that the alliance must be treated as such. Hell, Obama choose McCain #1 visceral issue then started acting like he, Obama, was in charge. Bad move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8376</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8376</guid>
		<description>coldH2Owi

Thank you for sharing - I will take either over John McCain anyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coldH2Owi</p>
<p>Thank you for sharing &#8211; I will take either over John McCain anyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldH2Owi</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8373</link>
		<dc:creator>coldH2Owi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8373</guid>
		<description>As usual, you two are making a lot of assumptions.  Sen. Clinton &amp; Sen. Obama are the people&#039;s enemy, as long as they continue along the corporate political road.  It&#039;s interesting how you two justify Sen. Clinton&#039;s errors by claiming Obama made the same error.  What&#039;s up with that?  My dear, departed Mother used to say two wrongs never make a right.  It must be different these days.  &amp; yes, they are ReThugs - must I draw you a picture?  (Apologies to Billy Bragg, now there would be a good President, so would Pink.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, you two are making a lot of assumptions.  Sen. Clinton &amp; Sen. Obama are the people&#8217;s enemy, as long as they continue along the corporate political road.  It&#8217;s interesting how you two justify Sen. Clinton&#8217;s errors by claiming Obama made the same error.  What&#8217;s up with that?  My dear, departed Mother used to say two wrongs never make a right.  It must be different these days.  &amp; yes, they are ReThugs &#8211; must I draw you a picture?  (Apologies to Billy Bragg, now there would be a good President, so would Pink.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8372</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8372</guid>
		<description>Also cold, what we need is to make sure that no one but no one gets in office AGAIN by exclusding any single states&#039; results.  When Bush rigged florida and then Ohio, it was a travesty.  Now, the Dems plan to do the same?  WTF&#039;s the difference at that point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also cold, what we need is to make sure that no one but no one gets in office AGAIN by exclusding any single states&#8217; results.  When Bush rigged florida and then Ohio, it was a travesty.  Now, the Dems plan to do the same?  WTF&#8217;s the difference at that point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8371</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8371</guid>
		<description>Pamela, also interesting reflection coming from someone whose candidacy has been a rosy picture of bipartisan reaching across the aisle with people now called &quot;Thugs.&quot;

If they&#039;re thugs, what the hell is your guy supporting bipartisanship with them for?  And if they aren&#039;t, they why are you trying to paint Clinton as evil because she&#039;s supposedly so much like them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela, also interesting reflection coming from someone whose candidacy has been a rosy picture of bipartisan reaching across the aisle with people now called &#8220;Thugs.&#8221;</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re thugs, what the hell is your guy supporting bipartisanship with them for?  And if they aren&#8217;t, they why are you trying to paint Clinton as evil because she&#8217;s supposedly so much like them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Much For Obama’s Bi-Partisan Unity Theory</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8367</link>
		<dc:creator>So Much For Obama’s Bi-Partisan Unity Theory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8367</guid>
		<description>[...] The Democratic Daily wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Today in the Washington Post in a front page story they recount the disaster that was a less than one week alliance between John McCain and Barrack Obama in his first year in office. Here’s the first three paragraphs: Obama, McCain Forged Fleeting Alliance Efforts to Collaborate on Ethics Reform Fell Apart Within a Week A year into his tenure on Capitol Hill, Barack Obama (D-Ill.) approached John McCain on the Senate floor to propose the two work together on a lobbying and ethics reform bill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Democratic Daily wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt Today in the Washington Post in a front page story they recount the disaster that was a less than one week alliance between John McCain and Barrack Obama in his first year in office. Here’s the first three paragraphs: Obama, McCain Forged Fleeting Alliance Efforts to Collaborate on Ethics Reform Fell Apart Within a Week A year into his tenure on Capitol Hill, Barack Obama (D-Ill.) approached John McCain on the Senate floor to propose the two work together on a lobbying and ethics reform bill [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8360</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8360</guid>
		<description>coldH2Owi

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I thought the ReThugs are our enemy, not each other.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Interesting reflection from someone who tends to treat Hillary Clinton as the enemy here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coldH2Owi</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I thought the ReThugs are our enemy, not each other.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting reflection from someone who tends to treat Hillary Clinton as the enemy here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldH2Owi</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator>coldH2Owi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/03/31/so-much-for-obamas-bi-partisan-unity-theory/#comment-8356</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, Democratic Daily folks, Janis says McCain is better for America than Obama, in fact she &quot;can’t stand Obama&quot;; an earlier post uses the low-life, but wealthy, Scaife as a new supporter of Sen. Clinton, &amp; over at Talk Left, they approve of Karl Rove&#039;s words regarding Sen. Clinton.  What the heck is going on here?  I thought the ReThugs are our enemy, not each other.  I sure hope this doesn&#039;t end bad.  McCain is a dangerous person, but..., but..., he&#039;s a maverick &amp; knows all about the inner workings of the Senate.  Frankly, who cares.  We needed that when LBJ got all of that great stuff through, but right now, we don&#039;t.  We need to make sure no ReThug sits in the White House for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, Democratic Daily folks, Janis says McCain is better for America than Obama, in fact she &#8220;can’t stand Obama&#8221;; an earlier post uses the low-life, but wealthy, Scaife as a new supporter of Sen. Clinton, &amp; over at Talk Left, they approve of Karl Rove&#8217;s words regarding Sen. Clinton.  What the heck is going on here?  I thought the ReThugs are our enemy, not each other.  I sure hope this doesn&#8217;t end bad.  McCain is a dangerous person, but&#8230;, but&#8230;, he&#8217;s a maverick &amp; knows all about the inner workings of the Senate.  Frankly, who cares.  We needed that when LBJ got all of that great stuff through, but right now, we don&#8217;t.  We need to make sure no ReThug sits in the White House for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

