Dizzy’s Ten Post Round-Up
By: Dizzy Dezzi
It’s almost the weekend, so before you go bask in the sun, bask in today’s Ten Post Round-Up:
1: Something to look forward to? Collection calls from New Delhi…
Another growing industry being outsourced to India–Brilliant at Breakfast
2: Sign of the times: Less lattes and Lasik…
And the Latte Indicator Says…Economy Screwed–The Huffington Post
3: There comes a time where you have to decide to take care of business for yourself…
4: Someone came up with a gadget to drive kids crazy and keep them from hanging around…
5: Will the third time be the charm for an actual conviction?…
Six Suspects Will Be Tried a Third Time in Sears Plot–New York Times
6: Some people are speculating that “franken-foods” seem a lot less scary with a food shortage looming…
7: Captain Obvious strikes again!….
“The US is the common denominator” in the increase of terrorism around the world – Think Tank–Signs of the Times
8: Bringing low ratings wherever he goes…
9: Even with permission, government does not want citizens to view the fallen…
What the Family Would Let You See, the Pentagon Obstructs–truthout
10: Another scandal in the Bush administration…
Stephen Johnson, The Environment’s Alberto Gonzales»–Wonk Room
269 días al final de un error…
(I like my morning cuppa with a little hypocrisy chaser)
Sphere: Related ContentTags: Alberto Gonzales, Bush Administration, Cameo, Chaser, Common Denominator, Cuppa, Deal Or No Deal, dizzy's ten post round-up, Economy, Food Crisis, Food Shortage, Franken Foods, Huffington Post, hypocrisy, New York Times, News, Outsourced, Politics, random goodies, random news, Reason Magazine, scandal, Sears, Signs Of The Times, snark, Truthout, War, weird, Wonk, World Identity
Related posts
Filed under: Bush Admin, Democratic Daily, Dizzy Dezzi, Economic News, Economy, In The News, Iraq, Military, N.Y. Times | Get Permalink or trackback |
I like and agree with most of the sentiments in #3, but I have to admit, I was sitting there going, “CAN WE CALL IT SOMETHING ELSE?” the whole time.
I know the author specified she wasn’t trying to be anti-gay by using the term, but … well, it’s an anti-gay slur. You sort of can’t be pro-gay and use it.
It’s a good article, though — it is important to be able to defend yourself as well as you can, and more important to believe that you are worth defending.