One Pundit’s Stupidity On Full Display
By: Stuart O'NeillForget any thing you ever hear from Mark Halprin. These overwhelmingly stupid remarks stunned even his fellow panelists. His premise? That the McCain house flap will rebound on Barack Obama and create serious damage. Please watch. [H/t to TPM for the original catch and Dkos for posting it on the front page.]
That was very nearly the most idiotic commentary I’ve ever seen after decades of following politics. The champ is then-Senator Zell Miller challenging Chris Matthews to a duel.
Sphere: Related ContentFiled under: ABC News, Bloggers, Consumers, DKos, Economy, Election '08, General Election, Housing, In The Blogosphere, In The News, John McCain '08, Obama-Biden 08, Political News, Politics, Presidential Election, Pundits, Stuart O'Neill, YouTube | Get Permalink or trackback |
One Response to “One Pundit’s Stupidity On Full Display”
Discuss It:
COMMENT POLICY: The Owner/Editor, Admin, Authors and Moderators of The Democratic Daily reserve the right to Edit or Delete comments as per our guidelines including comments that are offensive or inappropriate, violent or abusive, or off topic and ridiculous.
Comments are the view of the commenter and do not express the view of The Democratic Daily.
Our goal is to engage members and readers in civil conversation and discourse.
Name-calling, bashing or attacking members of The Democratic Daily, Democratic leaders in office or Democratic candidates will not be tolerated.
Foul language will be edited.
Remarks that may be construed as slanderous, bigoted, racist or advocating violence towards others, will be removed or edited.
DO NOT POST FULL ARTICLES.
We reserve the right to edit comments that post full articles or do not include links. Please include a link when quoting news or blogs in the comments.
Comments containing links may be held in Moderation due to Spam posted in our comments.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Halprin can’t hide the fact he roots for Republicans.
Chris Matthews once said, if you think you saw bias in a pundit’s face, … then it’s there.