<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Analysis Of Obama&#8217;s DNC Speech From The Rude One&#8230;and it&#8217;s very rude and very true</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 16:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20052</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20052</guid>
		<description>Theresa: Calling these folks on their lies/distortions is not dirty. Doing anything less is just plain a losing strategy. I watched Sen. Kerry for a few minutes this morning and I swear that he now understands the mistake he made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theresa: Calling these folks on their lies/distortions is not dirty. Doing anything less is just plain a losing strategy. I watched Sen. Kerry for a few minutes this morning and I swear that he now understands the mistake he made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20028</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20028</guid>
		<description>Unlike the campaign against Hillary which was often dirty, deliberately trying to convince voters that she lied about her accomplishments, the Obama campaign is right in sticking to issues.  Palin lives in Alaska and doesn&#039;t know the polar bear should be protected.  What is much worse is that she does not know the scientists are right in warning of global catastrophe from man-made global warming.  There are fair and accurate matters that should be publicised.  This is not playing dirty.  Planning a filthy campaign is definitely not the way to win over uncommitted voters.  It is the way to turn them off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike the campaign against Hillary which was often dirty, deliberately trying to convince voters that she lied about her accomplishments, the Obama campaign is right in sticking to issues.  Palin lives in Alaska and doesn&#8217;t know the polar bear should be protected.  What is much worse is that she does not know the scientists are right in warning of global catastrophe from man-made global warming.  There are fair and accurate matters that should be publicised.  This is not playing dirty.  Planning a filthy campaign is definitely not the way to win over uncommitted voters.  It is the way to turn them off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Prows</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20026</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Prows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20026</guid>
		<description>(1) So far, nobody will touch a mother abandoning her handicapped infant like this. Now if she wants to breast feed on air, or some such, I could see arguing that she&#039;s balancing her roles, but going 100% ploitics and 0% baby is outrageous. Also, babies need to sleep in their own beds at night, with their parents available as much as is possible.(2) Biden gets bashed for saying his wife looks good, and the same people give McCain a walk for suggesting that his wife could win the Miss Buffalochip Contest? I wonder if he&#039;ll enter little &quot;Gidget&quot; also.(3) &quot;Bush may not be popular but more people dislike the performance of Congress, and it&#039;s Democratic&quot;. Why are Republics being allowed to make major mileage off of this lie. Last I checked Dems had won most or all special elections this year proving that voters understand that the problem is coming from the other side of the aisle. The right has used the filibuster to keep many good ideas botteled up, and is now trying to use this line to force the left to allow Rep bills to be the only ones considered by causing stalemate and then capitalizing on it. They are trying to force rule by minority and I join Stuart in saying that it&#039;s they start getting what they deserve. Why should voters believe that we&#039;ll fight for them when we won&#039;t even fight for ourselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1) So far, nobody will touch a mother abandoning her handicapped infant like this. Now if she wants to breast feed on air, or some such, I could see arguing that she&#8217;s balancing her roles, but going 100% ploitics and 0% baby is outrageous. Also, babies need to sleep in their own beds at night, with their parents available as much as is possible.(2) Biden gets bashed for saying his wife looks good, and the same people give McCain a walk for suggesting that his wife could win the Miss Buffalochip Contest? I wonder if he&#8217;ll enter little &#8220;Gidget&#8221; also.(3) &#8220;Bush may not be popular but more people dislike the performance of Congress, and it&#8217;s Democratic&#8221;. Why are Republics being allowed to make major mileage off of this lie. Last I checked Dems had won most or all special elections this year proving that voters understand that the problem is coming from the other side of the aisle. The right has used the filibuster to keep many good ideas botteled up, and is now trying to use this line to force the left to allow Rep bills to be the only ones considered by causing stalemate and then capitalizing on it. They are trying to force rule by minority and I join Stuart in saying that it&#8217;s they start getting what they deserve. Why should voters believe that we&#8217;ll fight for them when we won&#8217;t even fight for ourselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20015</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20015</guid>
		<description>Peace Out &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How much more explicit must I be? We are supporting Obama here. Enough with the we-me the people stuff. I will edit it out of your comments in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peace Out </p>
<p>How much more explicit must I be? We are supporting Obama here. Enough with the we-me the people stuff. I will edit it out of your comments in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20013</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20013</guid>
		<description>Stuart&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I only knew you were posting it, didn&#039;t know how explicit the language was. I always, always edit language like that in anyone&#039;s posts here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart</p>
<p>I only knew you were posting it, didn&#8217;t know how explicit the language was. I always, always edit language like that in anyone&#8217;s posts here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PEACE OUT FOR UNITY</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20012</link>
		<dc:creator>PEACE OUT FOR UNITY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20012</guid>
		<description>God Bless our leaders in this country ! They&#039;ll chew y up on everything and I hate it but it&#039;s what they do to them ! Michelle&#039;s bra strap was showing in her speech and why didn&#039;t somebody fix that and tell her ! Right side of her dress ? They get torn up on image and it&#039;s wrong but the truth and do. It&#039;s wrong the media jumped all over Palin too ! They didn&#039;t even know anything about her or mention one issue she stood for but  jump in to attack ! Makes the news look foolish ! Hurricane Gustav ? God bless all those people !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God Bless our leaders in this country ! They&#8217;ll chew y up on everything and I hate it but it&#8217;s what they do to them ! Michelle&#8217;s bra strap was showing in her speech and why didn&#8217;t somebody fix that and tell her ! Right side of her dress ? They get torn up on image and it&#8217;s wrong but the truth and do. It&#8217;s wrong the media jumped all over Palin too ! They didn&#8217;t even know anything about her or mention one issue she stood for but  jump in to attack ! Makes the news look foolish ! Hurricane Gustav ? God bless all those people !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PEACE OUT FOR UNITY</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20011</link>
		<dc:creator>PEACE OUT FOR UNITY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20011</guid>
		<description>Creative drama set designers on stage look out and heads up ! Time out and that calligraphy on the W os that an M needs clarification ! Go get your camera fellows to check that out before you roll with production !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creative drama set designers on stage look out and heads up ! Time out and that calligraphy on the W os that an M needs clarification ! Go get your camera fellows to check that out before you roll with production !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20010</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20010</guid>
		<description>That quote was vetted with you before publishing. I must have missed something.  As to the attitude, she&#039;s earned it. And I&#039;m not campaigning. I&#039;m commenting. She deserves the anger of the American public because she is so manifestly unqualified yet proposes to be one heartbeat from the Presidency. Later I&#039;ll post a conversation I had with two young women yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You don&#039;t &#039;stick to the issues&#039; and win a filthy fight. Palin is just one surprise in a campaign that has already seen Republican outside groups run nearly racist ads. And another Democrat wants to play nice. We&#039;ve been playing nice for a long time. The other side doesn&#039;t. This time we don&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the hand slapping the face was a metaphor for the way Republicans get away with vicious attacks while we turn the other cheek. NOT hiim. Not me. Not this time. I&quot;m hoping not Obama-Biden, not the outside groups that support us. Nobody plays nice this time unless it&#039;s appropriate to the circumstances. Otherwise ATTACK. It may be isssue oriented not personal...but attack. His and her qualifications aren&#039;t personal. That&#039;s real world. That&#039;s reality. That&#039;s the serious nature of the offices.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;McCain said his #1 qualification for a VP would be their ability to step into the Oval Office. And he picks Pretty Palin? That alone calls into question his judgment.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That quote was vetted with you before publishing. I must have missed something.  As to the attitude, she&#8217;s earned it. And I&#8217;m not campaigning. I&#8217;m commenting. She deserves the anger of the American public because she is so manifestly unqualified yet proposes to be one heartbeat from the Presidency. Later I&#8217;ll post a conversation I had with two young women yesterday.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t &#8216;stick to the issues&#8217; and win a filthy fight. Palin is just one surprise in a campaign that has already seen Republican outside groups run nearly racist ads. And another Democrat wants to play nice. We&#8217;ve been playing nice for a long time. The other side doesn&#8217;t. This time we don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>And the hand slapping the face was a metaphor for the way Republicans get away with vicious attacks while we turn the other cheek. NOT hiim. Not me. Not this time. I&#8221;m hoping not Obama-Biden, not the outside groups that support us. Nobody plays nice this time unless it&#8217;s appropriate to the circumstances. Otherwise ATTACK. It may be isssue oriented not personal&#8230;but attack. His and her qualifications aren&#8217;t personal. That&#8217;s real world. That&#8217;s reality. That&#8217;s the serious nature of the offices.</p>
<p>McCain said his #1 qualification for a VP would be their ability to step into the Oval Office. And he picks Pretty Palin? That alone calls into question his judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PEACE OUT FOR UNITY</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-20009</link>
		<dc:creator>PEACE OUT FOR UNITY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-20009</guid>
		<description>Pamala !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Forget all the party line political for an interest of fair question ! Melissa E. singing at democratic convention and a great performance! Depending on camera angle the calligraphy is confusing in image and almost looks subliminal of question. Take a sharp look at the M or is that a W and it changes in image that&#039;s confusing. Makes one question,are they saying WE THE PEOPLE or ME THE PEOPLE ? We&#039;ve have had twenty people look at that and all say it&#039;s confusing when pointed out and go look ! We assume it is to resemble the Preamble to the Constitution.Check out the calligraphy image on stage back drop message as she&#039;s singing. Is that an M or a W ? Seems to change in image depending on camera angle. We called a few calligraphy experts to put their eye on that.We don&#039;t need any confusion on the wording of the Preamble or meaning ! We assume it&#039;s saying WE THE PEOPLE but depending on the camera angle viewing that W it changes to some degree and many may view it ME THE PEOPLE in meaning. That calligraphy is trickie ! Go put an eagle&#039;s eye on that ! Image clarification and you want no confusion democrats ! Where are Obama&#039;s stage presentation teams ? Called my buddie and he&#039;s a professional camera man retired and he sees it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamala !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Forget all the party line political for an interest of fair question ! Melissa E. singing at democratic convention and a great performance! Depending on camera angle the calligraphy is confusing in image and almost looks subliminal of question. Take a sharp look at the M or is that a W and it changes in image that&#8217;s confusing. Makes one question,are they saying WE THE PEOPLE or ME THE PEOPLE ? We&#8217;ve have had twenty people look at that and all say it&#8217;s confusing when pointed out and go look ! We assume it is to resemble the Preamble to the Constitution.Check out the calligraphy image on stage back drop message as she&#8217;s singing. Is that an M or a W ? Seems to change in image depending on camera angle. We called a few calligraphy experts to put their eye on that.We don&#8217;t need any confusion on the wording of the Preamble or meaning ! We assume it&#8217;s saying WE THE PEOPLE but depending on the camera angle viewing that W it changes to some degree and many may view it ME THE PEOPLE in meaning. That calligraphy is trickie ! Go put an eagle&#8217;s eye on that ! Image clarification and you want no confusion democrats ! Where are Obama&#8217;s stage presentation teams ? Called my buddie and he&#8217;s a professional camera man retired and he sees it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Leavey</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2008/08/30/an-analysis-of-obamas-dnc-speech-from-the-rude-oneand-its-very-rude-and-very-true/comment-page-1/#comment-19977</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Leavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2468#comment-19977</guid>
		<description>Buzz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The theory is if we go after her lack of experience it will come back to bite Obama, because of his own slender record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzz</p>
<p>The theory is if we go after her lack of experience it will come back to bite Obama, because of his own slender record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

