3 Responses to “An Intel Professionals View Of Panetta Appointment To CIA”

1. justConfused Said: on January 6th, 2009 at 9:27 pm

   I just followed this link from reddit.com and I’m hella confused about something.

   I noticed that your website doesn’t allow namebashing, attacking, etc. about the Democratic Party and that quite understandable. It’s your website and you may run it as you see fit. What troubles me is that you don’t place the same restrictions on other political parties. I consider myself liberal and don’t understand why your restrictions would be so specific. I don’t know anything about your site and I’m assuming that it tends to discuss issues dealing with the Democratic party or related topics.

   Don’t you think it be much more professional to have restrictions on attacking and namebashing on ANY party? I don’t care if you’re Republican or Communist, my arguments can stand on their own without telling people they can’t bash me back.

   It isn’t proper to do those kinds of attacks on anyone, right? I’m not telling you how to run things, but I’d hope you can see my point that I don’t see how it’s appropriate to allow attacks on any party. Freedom of speech as long as you’re not infringing on someone else, right?

2. Roundup II: Daily Digest: Obama Girl Is Out?; Pelosi Says No Change in Superdelegate Stance;, Bryant’s Hoop Dreams: Obama Will Talk B-Ball With Gumbe · Real Clear Politcs Said: on January 7th, 2009 at 11:14 pm

   [...] Click here to view the embedded video. [...]

3. Retch Ed · Real Clear Politcs Said: on January 7th, 2009 at 11:37 pm

   [...] Click here to view the embedded video. [...]