<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Intel Professionals View Of Panetta Appointment To CIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/01/06/an-intel-professionals-view-of-panetta-appointment-to-cia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/01/06/an-intel-professionals-view-of-panetta-appointment-to-cia/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 16:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retch Ed &#183; Real Clear Politcs</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/01/06/an-intel-professionals-view-of-panetta-appointment-to-cia/comment-page-1/#comment-31120</link>
		<dc:creator>Retch Ed &#183; Real Clear Politcs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=4375#comment-31120</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to view the embedded video. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to view the embedded video. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup II: Daily Digest: Obama Girl Is Out?; Pelosi Says No Change in Superdelegate Stance;, Bryant&#8217;s Hoop Dreams: Obama Will Talk B-Ball With Gumbe &#183; Real Clear Politcs</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/01/06/an-intel-professionals-view-of-panetta-appointment-to-cia/comment-page-1/#comment-31113</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup II: Daily Digest: Obama Girl Is Out?; Pelosi Says No Change in Superdelegate Stance;, Bryant&#8217;s Hoop Dreams: Obama Will Talk B-Ball With Gumbe &#183; Real Clear Politcs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=4375#comment-31113</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to view the embedded video. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to view the embedded video. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justConfused</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/01/06/an-intel-professionals-view-of-panetta-appointment-to-cia/comment-page-1/#comment-30927</link>
		<dc:creator>justConfused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=4375#comment-30927</guid>
		<description>I just followed this link from reddit.com and I&#039;m hella confused about something.

I noticed that your website doesn&#039;t allow namebashing, attacking, etc. about the Democratic Party and that quite understandable. It&#039;s your website and you may run it as you see fit. What troubles me is that you don&#039;t place the same restrictions on other political parties. I consider myself liberal and don&#039;t understand why your restrictions would be so specific. I don&#039;t know anything about your site and I&#039;m assuming that it tends to discuss issues dealing with the Democratic party or related topics.

Don&#039;t you think it be much more professional to have restrictions on attacking and namebashing on ANY party? I don&#039;t care if you&#039;re Republican or Communist, my arguments can stand on their own without telling people they can&#039;t bash me back.

It isn&#039;t proper to do those kinds of attacks on anyone, right? I&#039;m not telling you how to run things, but I&#039;d hope you can see my point that I don&#039;t see how it&#039;s appropriate to allow attacks on any party. Freedom of speech as long as you&#039;re not infringing on someone else, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just followed this link from reddit.com and I&#8217;m hella confused about something.</p>
<p>I noticed that your website doesn&#8217;t allow namebashing, attacking, etc. about the Democratic Party and that quite understandable. It&#8217;s your website and you may run it as you see fit. What troubles me is that you don&#8217;t place the same restrictions on other political parties. I consider myself liberal and don&#8217;t understand why your restrictions would be so specific. I don&#8217;t know anything about your site and I&#8217;m assuming that it tends to discuss issues dealing with the Democratic party or related topics.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think it be much more professional to have restrictions on attacking and namebashing on ANY party? I don&#8217;t care if you&#8217;re Republican or Communist, my arguments can stand on their own without telling people they can&#8217;t bash me back.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t proper to do those kinds of attacks on anyone, right? I&#8217;m not telling you how to run things, but I&#8217;d hope you can see my point that I don&#8217;t see how it&#8217;s appropriate to allow attacks on any party. Freedom of speech as long as you&#8217;re not infringing on someone else, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

