<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Signs SCHIP Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/02/04/obama-signs-schip-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/02/04/obama-signs-schip-bill/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 16:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bev</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/02/04/obama-signs-schip-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-32052</link>
		<dc:creator>bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=4856#comment-32052</guid>
		<description>Well, this is just one more step in treating cigarette smokers as second class citizens!   I really was hoping that President Obama would be the one to play fair with everyone.  It appears I was wrong.  I just don&#039;t see what is fair about saddling a &quot;specific&quot; group of citizens with the additional cost of providing health care for uninsured children.  An additonal 4m no less.  This is an additional cost for a &quot;specific &quot; group that is unfair taxation.  Seems to me, this cost should be shared by &quot;everyone&quot;.  If the SCHIP is to be funded by taxation, it should be a tax on something that &quot;everyone&quot; buys,,,,,like toilet paper!  I guess President Obama feels hurting a select group of citizens is better than putting a burden on all citizens!  If will agree to this type of unfair taxation,,,what else can we expect in the future.

I know everyone will not agree with this line of thinking(like non-smokers), but I am sure there is a large majority of citizens that do agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is just one more step in treating cigarette smokers as second class citizens!   I really was hoping that President Obama would be the one to play fair with everyone.  It appears I was wrong.  I just don&#8217;t see what is fair about saddling a &#8220;specific&#8221; group of citizens with the additional cost of providing health care for uninsured children.  An additonal 4m no less.  This is an additional cost for a &#8220;specific &#8221; group that is unfair taxation.  Seems to me, this cost should be shared by &#8220;everyone&#8221;.  If the SCHIP is to be funded by taxation, it should be a tax on something that &#8220;everyone&#8221; buys,,,,,like toilet paper!  I guess President Obama feels hurting a select group of citizens is better than putting a burden on all citizens!  If will agree to this type of unfair taxation,,,what else can we expect in the future.</p>
<p>I know everyone will not agree with this line of thinking(like non-smokers), but I am sure there is a large majority of citizens that do agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/02/04/obama-signs-schip-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-31997</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=4856#comment-31997</guid>
		<description>It is not the first step.  It is just another bump on the downhill slide we&#039;re on.  Before you ladel out any more praise on Obama show this bill for what it really is - it&#039;s just a directive forcing STATES to find ways to pay for insuring kids.  That&#039;s it.  The hard work, tough decisions and the sacrifice are going to be done by states and taxpayers who are already overburdened by feeding, educating, and sheltering people who can&#039;t afford kids but continue to have them anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not the first step.  It is just another bump on the downhill slide we&#8217;re on.  Before you ladel out any more praise on Obama show this bill for what it really is &#8211; it&#8217;s just a directive forcing STATES to find ways to pay for insuring kids.  That&#8217;s it.  The hard work, tough decisions and the sacrifice are going to be done by states and taxpayers who are already overburdened by feeding, educating, and sheltering people who can&#8217;t afford kids but continue to have them anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

