<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rep. Harman Wiretap Scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/04/20/rep-harman-wiretap-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/04/20/rep-harman-wiretap-scandal/</link>
	<description>Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Scott</title>
		<link>http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2009/04/20/rep-harman-wiretap-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-39950</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=7913#comment-39950</guid>
		<description>Who were the people behind Jane Harman introducing &quot;The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act?&quot; This bill might again be introduced. 

The Act&quot; while not written exactly like the Nazi 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that suspended the Reich Constitution, had the potential of bringing America to the same place trashing America’s civil liberties. Harman’s bill would have driven lawful political activists underground, perhaps creating the domestic terrorists Bush said we needed to be protected from. Under Harman’s bill HR 1955, Americans could be alleged without evidence by government to support domestic terrorism based on their speech, writings and association. Similarly on February 28, 1933 Hitler signed the Discriminatory Decrees banning free speech and association that “might cause” public disturbance or adversely affect the peace and security of the German State—according to police. 

Harman&#039;s &quot;Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act&quot; when closely examined, defined &quot;homegrown terrorism&quot; as &quot;any planned act&quot; that might use force to coerce the U.S. Government or its people to promote or accomplish a &quot;political or social objective.&quot; No force had to occur. Government would only have to allege an individual or group thought about using force.

Had Jane Harman’s bill passed in its present form, police provocateurs could easily have destroyed lawful anti-war groups, persons and organizations by simply misdirecting a few members to commit crimes so government could allege an entire organization supported homegrown terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who were the people behind Jane Harman introducing &#8220;The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act?&#8221; This bill might again be introduced. </p>
<p>The Act&#8221; while not written exactly like the Nazi 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that suspended the Reich Constitution, had the potential of bringing America to the same place trashing America’s civil liberties. Harman’s bill would have driven lawful political activists underground, perhaps creating the domestic terrorists Bush said we needed to be protected from. Under Harman’s bill HR 1955, Americans could be alleged without evidence by government to support domestic terrorism based on their speech, writings and association. Similarly on February 28, 1933 Hitler signed the Discriminatory Decrees banning free speech and association that “might cause” public disturbance or adversely affect the peace and security of the German State—according to police. </p>
<p>Harman&#8217;s &#8220;Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act&#8221; when closely examined, defined &#8220;homegrown terrorism&#8221; as &#8220;any planned act&#8221; that might use force to coerce the U.S. Government or its people to promote or accomplish a &#8220;political or social objective.&#8221; No force had to occur. Government would only have to allege an individual or group thought about using force.</p>
<p>Had Jane Harman’s bill passed in its present form, police provocateurs could easily have destroyed lawful anti-war groups, persons and organizations by simply misdirecting a few members to commit crimes so government could allege an entire organization supported homegrown terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.357 seconds -->
