Enviro Group Pitches New Climate Plan

The National Resources Defense Council unveiled a new proposal to combat the emissions which cause climate change.

Hoping to push climate change back onto the political stage, a prominent Washington environmental group on Tuesday unveiled a new proposal to sharply cut carbon emissions from U.S. power plants, featuring a unique federal-state partnership and flexibility for plant owners that will hold down costs and improve Americans’ health.

The proposal from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) calls for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to use its authority under the Clean Air Act to set standards for existing power plants—the largest source of U.S. carbon emissions that fuel climate change—that will cut millions of tons of carbon pollution, save thousands of lives and create thousands of clean energy jobs, the organization says in a statement.

The proposal enables states and electricity plant owners to use a wide range of existing technologies, including energy efficiency and renewable energy sources, to meet carbon pollution standards in the most cost-effective way. States would also have broad flexibility to design their own plans to meet the standards, NRDC says.

“The President put climate change on the national agenda, and NRDC’s plan shows how the United States can make big reductions in carbon pollution that drive climate change, with a flexible approach that promotes clean energy investments and delivers big benefits for Americans’ health,” said Peter Lehner, NRDC’s executive director. “This year’s ravaging heat waves, drought, wildfires and Superstorm Sandy underscore why the nation must tackle head-on the biggest source of dangerous carbon pollution now.”

NRDC’s proposal shows how the United States can dramatically reduce pollution from power plants that are responsible for 40 percent of the nation’s carbon pollution.

“We are overturning the conventional wisdom that reducing carbon pollution through the Clean Air Act would be ineffective and expensive,” says Dan Lashof, NRDC’s director of climate and clean air programs, and a principal author of the plan. “We show that the EPA can work with states and power companies to make large pollution reductions, by setting system-wide standards, rather than smokestack-by-smokestack ones, and by giving power companies and states the freedom to choose the most cost-saving means of compliance.

“The impact is huge: our proposal would eliminate hundreds of millions of tons of carbon pollution, save thousands of lives and stimulate a surge in clean energy and energy efficiency investments,” Lashof adds, “all at a lower cost than many would expect.”

Using the same sophisticated analytical tools relied on by both industry and the EPA, NRDC analysis shows the plan would:

  • Cut carbon pollution from the nation’s existing power plants 26 percent by 2020 and 34 percent by 2025.
  • Make large reductions in other dangerous pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, from existing power plants.
  • At a cost of about $4 billion in 2020, save Americans between $25 billion and $60 billion in lives saved, avoided illnesses and reduced climate change.
  • Save 3,600 lives, prevent more than 23,000 asthma attacks, avoid more than 2,300 emergency room visits and prevent nearly 1.2 million restricted activity and lost work days.
  • Stimulate investments of more than $90 billion in energy efficiency and renewable energy sources in the next eight years.
  • Create thousands of jobs, boost local and state economies, and move America toward a clean energy, clean air future.

NRDC commissioned consultancy ICF International to analyze the proposal using the company’s proprietary Integrated Planning Model (IPM). The utility industry and the EPA often use the IPM model to determine cost-effective ways of meeting the nation’s electricity needs, and to assess the effects of new standards. NRDC provided the depiction of the plan and other assumptions required for the analysis.

Under NRDC’s proposal, the EPA would use Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to set state-specific carbon emission rates that reflect the diversity of the nation’s electricity sector and fuel mix. Broad compliance flexibility would enable power plant owners and states to reduce emissions through cost-effective means that could be accomplished by:

  • · Reducing an individual plant’s carbon emissions by improving combustion efficiency, burning cleaner fuels or installing carbon capture and storage.
  • · Shifting generation from high-emitting to lower- or zero-emitting plants. Lower emitting sources such as gas, wind and solar would earn credits that other plants could use, to reduce average emissions rates.
  • · Expanding energy efficiency. State energy-efficiency programs could earn credits for avoiding power generation and its pollution. Generators could purchase those credits to use toward their emissions targets.
  • · States would have additional freedom to adopt alternative approaches–such as those already adopted by California, the Northeast states, and Colorado—as long as they are equally effective in cutting emissions.

NRDC developed its proposal on the heels of two Supreme Court rulings, in 2007 and 2011, that determined it is EPA’s job under the Clean Air Act to curb dangerous carbon pollution from the nation’s vehicles and power plants. To date, the Obama administration has taken important steps by setting fuel efficiency standards for mobile sources such as cars and trucks, and proposing standards for new power plants. But the biggest pollution source remains the hundreds of existing power plants.

“We know where the pollution is; now we just have to go after it,” Lashof says.


Bookmark and Share

Tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.