The Democratic Daily Political News, Progressive Commentary, Liberal Opinions and Common Sense Conversation... 2008-08-22T00:55:11Z WordPress http://thedemocraticdaily.com/feed/atom/ Pamela Leavey http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[Why the Debate Over McCain’s Eight Homes Matters]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2233 2008-08-22T00:55:11Z 2008-08-22T00:55:11Z Politico has pointed out that John McCain has not “Seven” homes, as the Obama camp points out in the ad below, but “Eight.”

Chris Cillizza’s analysis of “Why the Home Debate Matters” is spot on:

In politics, there is nothing worse than appearing out of touch.

From time immemorial, a candidate who is effectively portrayed as forgetting about the “little” people, of having “gone Washington,” of living higher on the hog than voters, loses.

Class remains a powerful motivator for many voters in the country. Politicians are forever trying to cast their candidacies as closely rooted in the communities from which they sprung — a purposeful attempt to ensure that voters know that the candidate “understands the problems of people like you.” Put simply: The worst thing you can call a politician is an elitist.

Cillizza reminds us, and honestly who could forget…

In 2004, Sen. John Kerry (Mass.) lost to George W. Bush for a number of reasons but one of the biggest was the fact that voters believed the Massachusetts senator was not like them. Thanks to a very effective Republican branding campaign (and with a major assist from Matt Drudge) the image many voters had of Kerry was of a windsurfing, Swiss boarding school-educated, swiss-cheese-on-cheesesteak-ordering elitist who could never understand the struggles that they and their families experienced on a daily basis.

McCain handed the Obama camp a ”double whammy” with his “house confusion.”

Not only does it allow them to paint the Arizona senator as out of touch with the concerns of voters but it also gives Obama a platform on which to tout himself as a champion of the working class.

This is a debate that matters, because the “little” people of America are struggling to make ends meet in this BushCo created credit crisis. They are struggling to pay their mortages and John McCain doesn’t even know how many houses he has… John McCain is an out of touch, conservative elitist who can’t pull the POW card to get out of this one.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
0
Pamela Leavey http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[Fighting Back]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2228 2008-08-21T21:02:17Z 2008-08-21T17:53:21Z Obama is finally taking the gloves off:

It’s “crunch time,” Barack Obama tells Karen Tumulty.

Indeed. There are signs that Obama has taken his gloves off and locked them in a cabinet somewhere, maybe in Hawaii.

The Obama campaign is officially sanctioning an attack on John McCain’s wealth and lifestyle — the first time they’ve been willing to go there.

The proximate cause is McCain’s fumbling answer to Politico about the number of houses he owns. (”. “I think — I’ll have my staff get to you”)

It’s about time Obama and his surrogates started hitting harder. It’s absurd that McCain doesn’t know “how many houses he owns.”

As Marc Ambinder notes…

The Obama campaign wants voters to get this message: “How can a guy who doesn’t know how many houses he owns, or what it means to be rich possibly feel your pain?”

McSame can’t feel your pain and voters that think he might get it, seriously need a wake up call. I mean really, do you want 4 - 8 years of the same miserable leadership we have suffered through with Bush? I know I don’t!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
1
Pamela Leavey http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[Stephanie Tubbs Jones Dies at 58]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2226 2008-08-21T03:02:38Z 2008-08-21T03:02:38Z I was very sad to read earlier today that Stephanie Tubbs Jones had passed away. Tubbs Jones died “after suffering a brain hemorrhage caused by a burst aneurysm.” She was 58.

Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose presidential candidacy Tubbs Jones had embraced, and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, recalled Tubbs Jones as “one of a kind” and “unwavering, indefatigable.”

Senator John Kerry today released the following statement in response to Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones’ passing:

“Theresa and I were shocked and saddened to hear of Stephanie Tubbs Jones’ untimely passing. This news breaks our hearts. Stephanie combined the best of heart, head, and spirit. She was a pioneer who led the way as the first African American woman from Ohio to be elected to Congress. When she was on your side, she was there all the way. We spent so many days together in 2004 and our friendship endured. She was one of a kind, the genuine article. We are praying for her family and loved ones.”

Tubbs Jones was “the first African-American woman in Congress from Ohio.” She was “in her Chrysler about 9 p.m. Tuesday when a Cleveland Heights police officer spotted her driving erratically.”

When the car stopped, the officer found Tubbs Jones unconscious but breathing. She was rushed to Huron Hospital in East Cleveland, where tearful local leaders arrived throughout Wednesday.

“She dedicated her life in public service to helping others and will continue to do so through organ donations,” said a statement issued by her family, Huron Hospital and the Cleveland Clinic. [...]

Tubbs Jones was admired by colleagues in both parties for her tenacity. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called her “a tireless force for justice, equality, and opportunity.” Minority Leader John Boehner, a Republican from southwest Ohio, said she was “a passionate representative who worked tirelessly to make Cleveland a better place for her constituents.”

Paired with an outgoing personality, her fearless approach took her from working-class Cleveland roots to Case Western Reserve University law school and rough-and-tumble Cuyahoga County politics before she arrived on the national scene.

She gained renewed prominence this year by campaigning passionately for Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid. But just after the 2004 presidential election, she also drew national attention for her claims, made on the floor of the House of Representatives, that electoral fraud and manipulation led to Bush’s re-election. It was only the second House election challenge since 1877.

That, more than any other single event, got her labeled as a partisan firebrand. Yet Steve LaTourette, the Republican congressman from Concord Township, said he considered Tubbs Jones “my dear, dear friend for more than 20 years, dating back to our days as county prosecutors.”

“She was a force of nature and always the most popular and gregarious person in any room,” LaTourette said.

Stokes, the 30-year congressman whose retirement created a chance for Tubbs Jones to run, described her as a “beautiful, bubbling, charismatic woman” who “was so highly talented.” No matter where she went, he said, “she lit the room up.”

Tubbs Jones, whose mother was a factory worker and father was a skycap at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, had planned to fly to Denver this Sunday for the Democratic National Convention. She was to be a super delegate and witness the formal nomination of Obama.

A great loss to America. RIP Stephanie Tubbs Jones, you will be missed in the halls of Congress and by many, no doubt whose lives you touched.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
1
Pamela Leavey http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[Veep Madness]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2224 2008-08-20T07:42:28Z 2008-08-20T07:42:28Z Everyone is buzzing about Obama’s pending announcement… Who will it be?

No guess from me… I’m hoping for Kerry or Clinton however, they are both appear to be long shots at this point.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
1
Pamela Leavey http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[Bloggers Moving…]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2222 2008-08-20T05:59:21Z 2008-08-20T05:59:21Z There’s some moving news in the progressive political blogosphere tonight. Although I have not had a chance to blog much lately, I did want to note that a couple of my favorite bloggers have new gigs and new homes in the blogosphere:

Kevin Drum is leaving The Washington Monthly and Political Animal for “a new blog at Mother Jones magazine.” You’ll find Kevin here as of Friday

Picking up where Kevin is leaving off at Political Animal will be Steve Benen of The Carpetbagger Report and Hilzoy of Obsidian Wings.

Congratulations to Kevin, Steve and Hilzoy on your new gigs.

All this moving news brings me to some moving news of my own. I’ve spent the past few days trying to figure out logisitics on moving cross country in the next few months. I haven’t finalized plans yet, so stay tuned…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
2
Stuart O'Neill http://www.politicalinterviews.com <![CDATA[Barack Obama At The VFW Convention In Florida]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2218 2008-08-19T18:04:49Z 2008-08-19T18:04:49Z While not having the opportunity to read the exact remarks or have an advance copy of Obama’s prepared remarks, DemFromCT has a substantive front page post at Daily Kos. DemFromCT has insightful comments and direct quotes. I recommend it to our readers.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
1
Walter Brasch http://www.walterbrasch.com <![CDATA[Downsizing Newspapers and Pretending to Improve Quality]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2214 2008-08-19T16:52:09Z 2008-08-19T14:46:35Z WANDERINGS, with Walter Brasch

Executive management at the Allentown Morning Call recently laid off more than two dozen persons from its newsroom, most of them veteran reporters drawing higher salaries. Management plans to cut 35–40 positions, according to a letter sent by publisher Timothy Johnson. The cuts are about one-fourth of the news staff. The remaining reporters are being told to write more stories under the same deadline constraints. Coverage of local meetings has been put into secondary importance; bureaus have been combined. The Morning Call is not alone.

About 85 percent of all dailies with more than 100,000 circulation, and about half of all dailies with circulations under 100,000, have cut the number of reporters and editors, according to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. During the first half of this year, newspapers laid off or froze more than 6,500 news positions. This was the biggest loss in three decades, according to the American Society of Newspaper Editors.

With the layoffs, news quality has suffered. A newsroom filled with younger reporters—they aren’t paid as much as the senior reporters who were terminated or laid off—leaves a newspaper vulnerable to a newsroom with less knowledge of the community and how to gather, report, and write news. Almost no newspapers have proofreaders. About 40 percent of all newspapers report they have fewer copyeditors today than just two years ago. No proofreaders means more typos. Fewer copyeditors means sloppier copy, more factual error, and a lot more stories that are incomplete.

During the past few years, newspaper owners demanded and were getting at 20–40 percent profit, among the highest for any industry—and that includes Big Oil. With newsrooms and the news product already lean, the owners kept taking and taking.

And now there’s an economic recession. Subscribers are questioning their annual $150–250 investments. Businesses are folding, and the ones remaining are reducing newspaper advertising budgets.

Go to any journalism conference, and you’ll see a lot of hand-wringing. Reporters and editors are whining about how bad it is. They rightly blame owners and publishers. But, they also blame readers for accepting abbreviated news drops from TV and myriad cable networks. They whine about the Blogosphere and Internet domination. They complain about the short attention span of their readers. It’s this and it’s that. And so, with the help of $500 an hour consultants who eruditely harrumph their grandeur of divine guesses, they make cosmetic changes. They follow the 24/7 cable networks and increase entertainment and gossip. They give us more syrupy “feel good” news. They say they want to be “relevant.” Editors at the Morning Call, like many newspapers, are placing light features and how-to columns higher than hard news. Some changes improve the product, most are band-aids. A decade ago, the American Society of Newspaper Editors published a study that revealed Americans wanted less, not more sensationalism, gossip, and celebrity news. Apparently, no one was listening to the people.

The system is broken, and it’s the owners’ fault. They have already “maximized profits” by low salaries and minimal benefits, giving veteran reporters “involuntary terminations,” significantly reduced employee education programs, cut the number of pages, reduced the page size, and increased the use of material provided by syndicates rather than local news staff. These latest cuts are deep into the muscle. Owners of the Morning Call, like owners at hundreds of other newspapers, apparently believe that reducing quality improves profits. The owners of the newspaper industry need a course in Basic Journalism 101.

A quality news product will increase circulation.

Increased circulation will bring more advertising.

More advertising brings better profits and allows even more news quality.

Cutting reporters, benefits, employee training, and news coverage is not the way to save newspapers.

[Walter Brasch, an award-winning former newspaper reporter and editor, is professor of journalism at Bloomsburg University, a syndicated columnist, and author of 17 books. He is former president of the Keystone (Pennsylvania) professional chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists and is currently president of the Pennsylvania Press Club. His latest book is Sinking the Ship of State: The Presidency of George W. Bush, available through amazon.com and other stores.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
1
Pamela Leavey http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[Musharraf Announces Resignation, Kerry Responds]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2211 2008-08-19T03:14:18Z 2008-08-19T03:12:37Z This morning Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf announced that he would resign. Musharraf has been under pressure to resign due to “impending impeachment charges.” His resignation will end “nearly nine years as one of the United States’ most important allies in the campaign against terrorism.” The scenario reminds me a bit of Nixon…

Speaking on television from his presidential office here at 1 p.m., Mr. Musharraf, dressed in a gray suit and tie, said that after consulting with his aides, “I have decided to resign today.” He said he was putting national interest above “personal bravado.”

“Whether I win or lose the impeachment, the nation will lose,” he said, adding that he was not prepared to put the office of the presidency through the impeachment process.

Senator John Kerry released the following statement today in response to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf’s decision to resign:

“President Musharraf’s decision to step aside is a welcome development for the people of Pakistan. His resignation is the latest reminder of the perils of this Administration’s personality-driven foreign policy that turned a blind eye to Pakistan’s people. President Bush and Vice President Cheney backed a discredited dictator, which has undercut our ability to work with the new government to eliminate the terrorist sanctuary that has reemerged in Pakistan’s tribal areas. Pakistan’s politicians must shift their focus from each other to preventing al Qaeda and Taliban forces from seeking safe havens from which to launch their next attacks. Over the long-term, the best way to fight extremism is for Pakistan’s politicians to use this opportunity to strengthen their democracy and deliver an economic plan that can improve the lives of their people. This ultimately is their fight and their future, but for their sake and ours, America needs to help them succeed.”

Kerry is a senior member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and chairs the Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South and Central Asian Affairs, which has jurisdiction over matters in Pakistan. Kerry spoke with the leadership of Pakistan’s coalition government last week.

Musharraf’s resignation comes “after 10 days of intense political maneuvering in Pakistan” and it clears ”the way for the four-month-old coalition government to choose a new president by a vote of Parliament and the provincial assemblies.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
0
Pamela Leavey http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[McCain Wasn’t in his ‘Cone of Silence’]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2207 2008-08-18T17:02:22Z 2008-08-18T16:59:31Z I didn’t get a chance to watch the Saddleback Forum with Pastor Rick Warren on Saturday, but Stuart has a great post on it below. Apparently, John McCain, who Rick Warren, claimed was in a ‘cone of silence’ during Barack Obama’s one on one with Warren, was not in his ‘cone of silence’ after all:

Members of the McCain campaign staff, who flew here Sunday from California, said Mr. McCain was in his motorcade on the way to the church as Mr. Obama was being interviewed by the Rev. Rick Warren, the author of the best-selling book “The Purpose Driven Life.”

The matter is of interest because Mr. McCain, who followed Mr. Obama’s hourlong appearance in the forum, was asked virtually the same questions as Mr. Obama. Mr. McCain’s performance was well received, raising speculation among some viewers, especially supporters of Mr. Obama, that he was not as isolated during the Obama interview as Mr. Warren implied.

The McCain camp is pushing back on the insinuation may have cheated, calling it “outrageous.” And Pastor Warren claims to be clueless that McCain was not in the building in his ‘cone of silence’ during Obama’s interview with Warren:

Mr. Warren, the pastor of Saddleback, had assured the audience while he was interviewing Mr. Obama that “we have safely placed Senator McCain in a cone of silence” and that he could not hear the questions.

After Mr. Obama’s interview, he was joined briefly by Mr. McCain, and the candidates shook hands and embraced.

Mr. Warren started by asking Mr. McCain, “Now, my first question: Was the cone of silence comfortable that you were in just now?”

Mr. McCain deadpanned, “I was trying to hear through the wall.”

Interviewed Sunday on CNN, Mr. Warren seemed surprised to learn that Mr. McCain was not in the building during the Obama interview.

If McCain entered into his one on one interview with Warren with knowledge of the questions asked ahead of time, indeed he did cheat. See Memeorandum for all the buzz.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
1
Stuart O'Neill http://www.politicalinterviews.com <![CDATA[McBush Does Very Well…Obama Had The Substance]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2199 2008-08-17T22:12:00Z 2008-08-17T20:32:45Z I don’t know how many DemDaily readers watched the entire forum yesterday from Saddleback Church, hosted by Rick Warren. For me it was very personal because, at one point of my life when I had a very, very significant other who was a member of the church, I got to know Rick Warren very well. He is a very, very legit guy.

I really don’t think Obama ‘won’ the event. He put on an impressive display but he has not yet learned the overwhelming importance of narrative. He had the complexities of power and policy down cold. But most audiences read much more into a narrative, a story, than nuanced answers

McBush put on a exquisite show of the power of narrative and story (remember the book I wanted you all to read, “The Power and The Story”?) while avoiding the nuances in the policy decisions. He also used his military captivity very well getting huge amounts of points for his decision, if it really was his, not to come home early. McBush was as good as he’s ever been in a story telling format that suited him well. I doubt he will equal it again. If he’d had to truly debate Obama he would not have done nearly as well.

Amazingly McBush didn’t say that his greatest moral failure was being an adulterer instead of just saying ‘his first marriage’. Of course Cindy McCain’s money and family fame got him into Congress and the Senate. Moving instantly into Cindy’s coming home and introducing his to ‘his new daughter’ showed us, not only compassion, but who has the real power in that family. McBush did very well in this particular format. But his saber rattling at Russia, his insistence that the war in Iraq can be WON were non-starters for the general American public.

Obama got a lot of applause from a truly conservative crowd. It was impressive. Not at much as McBush but that was to be expected. If you wanted one-liners and good stories, true or not, then you loved his performance and I agree it was his best. If you wanted substance, quiet competence as well as an understanding that there are a lot of grays in our world today…Obama did very well.

For Obama, his insistence on the nuanced answer (which is usually the most accurate overall) is proving to be an issue in this campaign as it was for John Kerry. Put him one on one with McBush and I think he’ll come out on top when his answers have to be much more succinct. He had better learn this narrative reality. His campaign has to accept that fighting is part of the game.

I’ll give McBush the edge in the overall popularity but not in the essence of the moment about the presidency. He had the best jokes and stories. McBush hasn’t done this well before and I doubt he will again. It was a good afternoon for him. This was a perfect format and personal interaction for him. Both knowing and joking with Rick also set a very different tone to this event.

McCain has continually stepped on his tongue in this campaign. He certainly did not yesterday. But yesterday is yesterday. There many months of time for him to do a lot of screw-ups as badly as he has previously.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
5
Darrell Prows http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[Why do we even let the riff raff vote?]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2192 2008-08-17T16:11:03Z 2008-08-17T04:24:50Z Paraguay just had an election. The “leftist” won.

The whole problem with allowing poor countries to have real elections is that it’s guaranteed that there will be a candidate to run the country who talks about using national resources to benefit the national population. Well, if you let people vote for things that are in their own self interest it seems inevitable that they go with what’s best for themselves. I mean, how can that not be a problem?

The guy who just upset 60 years of precedent in Paraguay wants to benefit the majority of the population. At his swearing in ceremony were Chavez of Venezuela, Morales of Bolivia, and Correa of Ecuador. Geez, if this wasn’t a perfect opportunity for a shot from a missile on a Predator Drone, what’s it going to take?

Dude has a religious background, thinks that the rich don’t have an automatic entitlement to everything, and wants to do what he can to get a little prosperity going for everyone.

Our country, of course, will inevitably find a way to demonize this effort.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
0
Darrell Prows http://www.thedemocraticdaily.com <![CDATA[What’s that smell?]]> http://thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2190 2008-08-17T16:15:13Z 2008-08-17T03:41:15Z When Reagan and Daddy Bush finally tied the knot after their big dustup in 1980, the only reasonable conclusion was that they were really consummating a marriage between the military/industrial complex and big oil. This probably started out as a tenuous union but eventually morphed into the shadow entity most appropriately known as BUSHCO.         

Fast forward to the “presidency” of Junior Bush (he who smiles for the camera in Beijing, giving inane interviews on sports while the country of Georgia sprouts a smallish, but still important, military clash). Did the oil end of the dual headed beast get properly fed subsequent to the 2000 “election”? Maybe the best way to answer this question is to agree that the size of the windfall is in the multi trillions of dollars and leave it at that.But what about the far more sizeable segment of the U.S. economy that depends on military contracts for its “bread and butter” (“champagne and caviar”, of course, being far closer to the truth but somehow the focus always gets directed to the folks on the assembly line rather than on those receiving their share of the BUSHCO provided money mountain)?

I mean, sure, the death merchants (make that the BUSHCO merchants of fast human death rather than the slow planetary death side of things) had Afghanistan handed to them by Bin Laden, and Iraq thrown gratuitously into their lap while most folks were acting too stupid to notice, but have things really been equitable? I mean, the defense budget has at most doubled compared to what would have happened anyway, and Halliburton, long time oil industry, and only short time defense industry player, sponges up money that would otherwise have gone to traditional M/IC players.         

Something just had to be done to steal more of our money for the weapons makers and keeping “Star Wars” on indefinite life support, while pushing old cold war buttons over at the Kremlin certainly seems to be enough to get the job done. Really dig into the numbers and the whole ABM concept has always penciled out as costing enough, if allowed to drag on, to literally bankrupt our country all by itself. This is due, of course, to the fact that it requires a virtual infinite timeline and infinite budget to prove that it ultimately is not viable. Or we could just accept the views of those experts who posit that fifty million dollar suitcase nukes really can be depended upon to trump multi trillion dollar planetary security blankets that protect only against obsolete notions of what sorts of things are truly threatening.          

Still, Russia can’t afford to be caught with a “weapon of mass destruction” on our soil, and can’t be sure that it would not fail if it tried to smuggle something in. So the safer bet is to try to defeat our trying to create what can only be called a “first strike capability.” And the only weapon available for that is escalating belligerence in response to what should most honestly be labeled as our provocations, and what BUSHCO is laboring mightily to pawn off as nothing other than our righteous indignation.         

Except that Georgia attacked Russia, and not the other way around. And except that no sentient being would believe that Russia would acquiesce to the U.S. building an ABM system (whatever that might actually turn out to consist of) smack dab in the middle of where we would want it to be if we really were planning to use it aggressively.         

And then there’s the fact that BUSHCO, of all people, forgot that the lands of Russia contain more developable resources, including hydrocarbons, than any other nation on the planet. We bid up oil, etc. and Russia gains untold wealth as a result. And then we implement a foreign policy initiative at the expense of Russia, and do so while ignoring the fact that an economically resurgent Russia, which we caused, now has the economic and political resources to effectively counter our move.         

But at least we have created tension, and tension will move product. At least if by “product” we mean things that make very loud noises, cause death and destruction, and really now exist mainly for the purpose of furthering the agenda of the Republican Party (as hijacked by BUSHCO).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
]]>
0